Hi, I''m still observing the behavior already described on the list, I''m getting "/usr/share/fonts/Vera.ttf" as the filename in cairo, where it should be "/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf". Any chance we can get this fixed soon? Humm, I don''t know what the schedule for 2.4 is, but the GNOME 2.14 release is approaching rather fast... Thanks, --behdad http://behdad.org/ "Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill" -- Dan Bern, "New American Language"
Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@cs.toronto.edu> ????????:> Hi, > > I''m still observing the behavior already described on the list, > I''m getting "/usr/share/fonts/Vera.ttf" as the filename in cairo, > where it should be "/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf". > > Any chance we can get this fixed soon? Humm, I don''t know what > the schedule for 2.4 is, but the GNOME 2.14 release is > approaching rather fast...I still need the attached patch to fix the problem. Patrick somehow didn''t like this patch but I still think it is necessary. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: full-path-problem.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 586 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20060129/103a66b0/full-path-problem.bin -------------- next part -------------- -- Mike FABIAN <mfabian@suse.de> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian ?????????????
Mike FABIAN wrote:> I still need the attached patch to fix the problem. > > Patrick somehow didn''t like this patch but I still think it is > necessary.Yes, I see that your patch is correct now that I have a chance to look at it while not in a third-world country. I''ve committed it. (When I first looked at it I didn''t see why it was necessary as I misread ''strncmp'' as ''strcmp''). pat
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:> Hi, > > I''m still observing the behavior already described on the list, > I''m getting "/usr/share/fonts/Vera.ttf" as the filename in cairo, > where it should be "/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf". > > Any chance we can get this fixed soon? Humm, I don''t know what > the schedule for 2.4 is, but the GNOME 2.14 release is > approaching rather fast...fontconfig seems to have too many problems for a 2.4 release at the moment, although if we can get a bunch of people successfully using the current CVS maybe we can start thinking about a 2.4 release again. I''m not aware of any new features we need to add, anyway. pat