I have converted the same wav file with FLAC 1.1.2 on two different machines. Flac on these two machines was installed at different times (about 2 months apart) but the version incl all the file sizes and time stamps are the same so I am pretty sure it's exactly the same program. Despite that the two machines produce different results. Nevertheless, after converting the flac files back to wav the result on both machines are the same. So the question is what is going on here? Are the algorithms used different on different machines? In my case one of them is a dual Athlon and the other one a Pentium M. Rob ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
--- "Rob M." <rmdiv2000@yahoo.com> wrote:> I have converted the same wav file with FLAC 1.1.2 on > two different machines. Flac on these two machines was > installed at different times (about 2 months apart) > but the version incl all the file sizes and time > stamps are the same so I am pretty sure it's exactly > the same program. Despite that the two machines > produce different results. Nevertheless, after > converting the flac files back to wav the result on > both machines are the same. So the question is what is > going on here? Are the algorithms used different on > different machines? In my case one of them is a dual > Athlon and the other one a Pentium M.there are different code paths through the encoder chosen at runtime that are optimized for different environments which can create different streams. nothing to worry about. Josh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Reasonably Related Threads
- problem with 24 bit odd size file (even in new version)
- flac-1.1.3 fails to decode where flac-1.1.2 works
- flac-1.1.3 fails to decode where flac-1.1.2 works
- incl.non.slopes=FALSE does not work at predict.lm
- flac-1.1.3 fails to decode where flac-1.1.2 works