Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:> Hmm. I remember that the second patch didn't apply cleanly > after the first patch and just assumed that the second patch > duplicated changes in the first patch. > > Please provide another patch and we will try again.The diff to the current git is attached.> PS: I've also been accepting pull requests via github if you'd > like to try that.I'll look into it, thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: stream_enc_diff.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2770 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20151118/d9f03bee/attachment.obj
Erik de Castro Lopo
2015-Nov-19 09:08 UTC
[flac-dev] [PATCH] for stream_encoder_intrin_*.c
lvqcl wrote:> The diff to the current git is attached.Applied. Thanks. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:>> The diff to the current git is attached. > > Applied. Thanks.Thanks. I think I know what happened: I made the first patch and forgot to make a commit, so these changes were included in my second patch too.