Martijn van Beurden wrote:> One other issue that I've brought up before but hasn't been > fixed yet: none of the people that have contributed to FLAC in > the last few years (save Miroslav) are in the AUTHORS file :)flac-website Git is also slightly outdated (dead links, some text is obsolete, etc). Maybe it's time to update it too? And, doc/html/* in flac Git is even older.
op 19-06-14 19:31, lvqcl schreef:> flac-website Git is also slightly outdated (dead links, some text > is obsolete, etc). Maybe it's time to update it too?Yeah, I might do that sometime soon.> And, doc/html/* in flac Git is even older.I've cleaned that up quite recently: http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=943384d7c3301c1fb54096e2250db36435d3943c Is there anything specific you're referring too? Aside from quite a lot of links to the sourceforge bugtracker that are now 301-forwarded, there aren't much 404's to fix there, right?
Martijn van Beurden wrote:>> flac-website Git is also slightly outdated (dead links, some text >> is obsolete, etc). Maybe it's time to update it too? > > Yeah, I might do that sometime soon.Great. I just posted a message about problematic places in html docs that I found.>> And, doc/html/* in flac Git is even older. > > I've cleaned that up quite recently: > http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=943384d7c3301c1fb54096e2250db36435d3943c > > Is there anything specific you're referring too? Aside from > quite a lot of links to the sourceforge bugtracker that are now > 301-forwarded, there aren't much 404's to fix there, right?I meant the files themselves are older. For example, documentation_bugs.html: http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac-website.git;a=blob_plain;f=documentation_bugs.html;hb=HEAD "The following are major known bugs in the current (1.2.1) release:" http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/html/documentation_bugs.html;hb=HEAD "The following are major known bugs in the current (1.1.4) release:"