flac dev - Apr 2012 - Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion

Josh Coalson wrote:
> I haven't checked git yet but I hope this patch has not gone in.? I
> don't like the special case that this is creating.
> 
> It would be better to allow MM:SS everywhere but I consider that low
priority.
I modified version of that patch did go in. See the following commits:

https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=19050f74eaa1aa6d609ca065e1a854ada5bb6b4c
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=7ee908403e8be011b8a7dd3bf511408b40312c2e
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=ce8a75134cace056f6c436d54b57bad1a1d93797


Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/

> From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com>
> To: flac-dev at xiph.org
> Cc: Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to
completion
> 
> Josh Coalson wrote:
> 
>>  I haven't checked git yet but I hope this patch has not gone in.?
I
>>  don't like the special case that this is creating.
>> 
>>  It would be better to allow MM:SS everywhere but I consider that low 
> priority.
> 
> I modified version of that patch did go in. See the following commits:
> 
>
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=19050f74eaa1aa6d609ca065e1a854ada5bb6b4c
>
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=7ee908403e8be011b8a7dd3bf511408b40312c2e
>
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=ce8a75134cace056f6c436d54b57bad1a1d93797
> 
> 
> Erik
I saw.? I like almost all the progress on recent patches but not this one.? Can
it be
backed out or replaced with proper MM:SS handling?

Josh Coalson wrote:
> > From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com>
> > To: flac-dev at xiph.org
> > Cc: Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to
run to completion
> > 
> > Josh Coalson wrote:
> > 
> >>  I haven't checked git yet but I hope this patch has not gone
in.? I
> >>  don't like the special case that this is creating.
> >> 
> >>  It would be better to allow MM:SS everywhere but I consider that
low
> > priority.
> > 
> > I modified version of that patch did go in. See the following commits:
> > 
> >
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=19050f74eaa1aa6d609ca065e1a854ada5bb6b4c
> >
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=7ee908403e8be011b8a7dd3bf511408b40312c2e
> >
https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commit;h=ce8a75134cace056f6c436d54b57bad1a1d93797
> > 
> > 
> > Erik
> 
> I saw.? I like almost all the progress on recent patches but not this one.?
Can it be
> backed out or replaced with proper MM:SS handling?
I really like the idea of fixing it with proper MM:SS handling.

Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/