On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:48:10PM +0900, ??? wrote:> FLAC__bitbuffer_read_rice_signed_block() function has most proccessing > time. > Any comments or advices for optimization shall always be welcome.I sent a patch improving this function to the old mailing list on 6 Feb 2003 18:33:40 +0100, subject "bitbuffer optimizations". I don't know if it is still possible to apply the patch to the current code (I have written my own decoder for my limited purposes), but at least you can give it a try. -- Miroslav Lichvar
--- Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix.inf.upol.cz> wrote:> On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:48:10PM +0900, ??? wrote: > > FLAC__bitbuffer_read_rice_signed_block() function has most > proccessing > > time. > > Any comments or advices for optimization shall always be welcome. > > I sent a patch improving this function to the old mailing list on > 6 Feb 2003 18:33:40 +0100, subject "bitbuffer optimizations". I > don't know if it is still possible to apply the patch to the current > code.it probably can, I haven't touched the bitbuffer in a long time. I will revisit it after the release (had lost track of it). Josh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com