--- Sigmund Augdal <sigmunau@stud.ntnu.no> wrote:> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:58:22PM +0100, Sander Roobol wrote: > > Hello Dan Johnson, hello list, > > > > It's really weird that there's no working command line player for > FLAC > > files. Dan Johnson created flac123 (licensed under the GPL) to fill > that > > gap, and started the flac-tools project. > > Starting with version 0.5.2, VLC ( http://www.videolan.org/vlc ) > supports > flac. VLC is fully useable from the command line. Flac support is > still very > basic in VLC, but it's a start :). > > If anyone wants to test it, please report any trubble to me or > vlc-devel@videolan.orgCool, I added a link on the FLAC page. As for flac123, it would actually be nice to revive that, and at the same time migrate the plugins there (to flac-tools I mean, kind of like the separate vorbis packages libvorbis and vorbis-tools). It's all getting to be a little more that I can keep up with right now and most of the TODO items now are in the tools. Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:35:04AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:> As for flac123, it would actually be nice to revive that, and at > the same time migrate the plugins there (to flac-tools I mean, > kind of like the separate vorbis packages libvorbis and > vorbis-tools). It's all getting to be a little more that I can > keep up with right now and most of the TODO items now are in the > tools.That would be fine with me too. Maybe we should go one step further, and create a separate place for the plugins too, just like vorbis did: flac (libs only), flac-tools (flac, metaflac, flac123, more?), flac-plugins (xmms, winamp, etc). Related to this, how's the migration of the CVS repository to Xiph.org going? I guess it would be cool to put the flac-tools repository there too... (same for the flac-plugins repostory, if it would be created) Sander
--- Sander Roobol <phy@wanadoo.nl> wrote:> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:35:04AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > As for flac123, it would actually be nice to revive that, and at > > the same time migrate the plugins there (to flac-tools I mean, > > kind of like the separate vorbis packages libvorbis and > > vorbis-tools). It's all getting to be a little more that I can > > keep up with right now and most of the TODO items now are in the > > tools. > > That would be fine with me too. Maybe we should go one step further, > and > create a separate place for the plugins too, just like vorbis did: > flac > (libs only), flac-tools (flac, metaflac, flac123, more?), > flac-plugins > (xmms, winamp, etc).good idea.> Related to this, how's the migration of the CVS repository to > Xiph.org > going? I guess it would be cool to put the flac-tools repository > there > too... (same for the flac-plugins repostory, if it would be created)the CVS move is on hold for now. the web site will probably move first; one of the Xiph guys is redoing the html. Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com