I''m building for AMD-64/EMT64. The build terminates this:
Requires: libflask.so.1.0()(64bit) libfsimage.so.1.0()(64bit)
libxenctrl.so.3.2()(64bit) libxenguest.so.3.2()(64bit) libxenstore.so.3.0()
(64bit)
Checking for unpackaged
file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/xen-3.2.0-2.fc8-root
RPM build errors:
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
user mockbuild does not exist - using root
group mockbuild does not exist - using root
File not found by
glob:
/var/tmp/xen-3.2.0-2.fc8-root/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pygrub-*.egg-info
File not found by
glob:
/var/tmp/xen-3.2.0-2.fc8-root/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/xen-*.egg-info
[root@potoroo ~]#
I''m using the standard rpm configuration for F8.
It''s only the glob messages that concern me.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 06:53:30PM +0900, John Summerfield wrote:> I''m building for AMD-64/EMT64. The build terminates this: > Requires: libflask.so.1.0()(64bit) libfsimage.so.1.0()(64bit) > libxenctrl.so.3.2()(64bit) libxenguest.so.3.2()(64bit) libxenstore.so.3.0() > (64bit) > Checking for unpackaged > file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/xen-3.2.0-2.fc8-rootThe way python is handled in F9 change slightly, so F9 RPMs will not rebuild for F8 without modifications. We don''t intend to support 3.20 on Fedora 8 - we''re stickin with 3.1.x bug fix tree. Upstream Xen will however provide 3.2.0 RPMs for Fedora 8 for those who wish to try it out ahead of official Fedora 9 release http://xen.org/download/dl_32rhel8.html Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
John, Are you trying to rebuild an F9 rpm as Dan suggests, or are you trying to build directly from the source tarball from xen.org? I didn''t think much of anything would build with the standard rpm configuration for Fedora (though I haven''t run F8), so my first thought would be that you need to install some other rpms, but I can''t really suggest which ones, if any of those required files don''t exist on your system, you may be able to find out what needs installed to obtain them from a site like rpmfind.net. If all of those files do exist, then I can''t really tell you what those errors mean, but assuming you let the group know that you are trying to build from the xen.org source, then maybe someone else can help. On the other hand, it may be that a difference in python versions available from F8 to F9 could still make a difference leaving you to wit for xen.org rpms for F8 or build a newer version of python manually as well. Good luck with whatever you''re trying, Dustin -----Original Message----- From: fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Daniel P. Berrange Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 08:59 To: John Summerfield Cc: fedora-xen@redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Problem building xen-3.2 on f8 On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 06:53:30PM +0900, John Summerfield wrote:> I''m building for AMD-64/EMT64. The build terminates this: > Requires: libflask.so.1.0()(64bit) libfsimage.so.1.0()(64bit) > libxenctrl.so.3.2()(64bit) libxenguest.so.3.2()(64bit)libxenstore.so.3.0()> (64bit) > Checking for unpackaged > file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/xen-3.2.0-2.fc8-rootThe way python is handled in F9 change slightly, so F9 RPMs will not rebuild for F8 without modifications. We don''t intend to support 3.20 on Fedora 8 - we''re stickin with 3.1.x bug fix tree. Upstream Xen will however provide 3.2.0 RPMs for Fedora 8 for those who wish to try it out ahead of official Fedora 9 release http://xen.org/download/dl_32rhel8.html Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
Dustin Henning wrote:> John, > Are you trying to rebuild an F9 rpm as Dan suggests, or are you > trying to build directly from the source tarball from xen.org? I didn''t > think much of anything would build with the standard rpm configuration for > Fedora (though I haven''t run F8), so my first thought would be that you need > to install some other rpms, but I can''t really suggest which ones, if any of > those required files don''t exist on your system, you may be able to find out > what needs installed to obtain them from a site like rpmfind.net. If all of > those files do exist, then I can''t really tell you what those errors mean, > but assuming you let the group know that you are trying to build from the > xen.org source, then maybe someone else can help. On the other hand, it may > be that a difference in python versions available from F8 to F9 could still > make a difference leaving you to wit for xen.org rpms for F8 or build a > newer version of python manually as well. Good luck with whatever you''re > trying,I haven''t seen Dan''s reply yet, and might not if he''s replied off-list. I am trying to build the f9 rpm, the problem is the rpm''s trying to package files that don''t get created (and I can''t see any way they could get created).> Dustin > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com] > On Behalf Of Daniel P. Berrange > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 08:59 > To: John Summerfield > Cc: fedora-xen@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Problem building xen-3.2 on f8 > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 06:53:30PM +0900, John Summerfield wrote: >> I''m building for AMD-64/EMT64. The build terminates this: >> Requires: libflask.so.1.0()(64bit) libfsimage.so.1.0()(64bit) >> libxenctrl.so.3.2()(64bit) libxenguest.so.3.2()(64bit) > libxenstore.so.3.0() >> (64bit) >> Checking for unpackaged >> file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/xen-3.2.0-2.fc8-root > > The way python is handled in F9 change slightly, so F9 RPMs will not > rebuild for F8 without modifications. We don''t intend to support 3.20 > on Fedora 8 - we''re stickin with 3.1.x bug fix tree. Upstream Xen will > however provide 3.2.0 RPMs for Fedora 8 for those who wish to try it > out ahead of official Fedora 9 release > > http://xen.org/download/dl_32rhel8.htmlThe packages there are unsuitable, I''m 64-bit. I''m continuing the search. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa@coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa@coco.merseine.nu -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-)
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:48:30 am John Summerfield wrote:> > > I am trying to build the f9 rpm, the problem is the rpm''s trying to > package files that don''t get created (and I can''t see any way they could > get created).After some finger failures, I have built Ian''s xen 3.2.0 src.rpm and installed the results, and booted the latest 2.6.21 f9 kernel (which I note is upgraded to 3.2). So far, testing has been limited to "xm list" which works as expected.