Fedora xen - Jul 2006 - RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [PATCH 0 of 5] fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64

Hi Akio,
	Thank you for your information. I am using the CSet34705 which should be
latest, and do you mean I should apply Aron''s patches on it. right?  In
addition, what''s status about it?
BTW, 

Thanks & Best Regards
-Xiantao

OTC,Intel Corporation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@jp.fujitsu.com]
> Sent: 2006年7月27日 16:47
> To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@redhat.com; Chris Wright;
> fedora-ia64-list@redhat.com; xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5]
> fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
> 
> Hi, Xiantao
> 
> BZ''s patch is old.
> Today 139 cset is added to linux-2.6-xen-fedora tree.
> So I think we should use Aron''s patches.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Akio Takebe
> 
> >Hi Aron,
> >	Could you share me the current status for fedora-xen-ia64? Through
your
> 
> >mails, I see we should focus our efforts on linux-2.6-xen-fedora. But
when
> >I applied the patch 199684 on it, conflicts occurs. Do you have any
> >suggestion for contributing to Fedora ?
> >Thanks & Best Regards
> >-Xiantao
> >
> >OTC,Intel Corporation
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com]
> >> On Behalf Of Aron Griffis
> >> Sent: 2006ト・ヤツ27ネユ 12:11
> >> To: Juan Quintela
> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@redhat.com; Chris Wright;
> >> fedora-ia64-list@redhat.com; Alex Williamson;
> >> xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >> Subject: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fix linux-2.6-xen-fedora on
ia64
> >>
> >> Hi Juan,
> >>
> >> These patches are the result of Akio, Prarit, Alex and me working
on fixing
> >> the
> >> ia64 build of your tree.  At this point the bare-metal Linux
kernel
> >> builds and
> >> boots.  The xen kernel builds but doesn''t complete
booting.  Nonetheless,
> >> since
> >> these patches seem to take us most of the way there, we''d
like to request
> >>  them
> >> to be applied to your tree.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Aron
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

Hi, Xiantao

Yes, you are right.
And I think you must use the following patch.

Now I cannot boot by using xen-ia64-unstable 
(not linux-2.6-xen-fedora) on FC6.
I''m debuging it.
Then I''ll try to boot by using xen-ia64-unstable/xen and linux-2.6-xen-
fedora.

diff -r 61b945565398 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h	Wed Jul 26 17:22:38 2006 +0200
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h	Wed Aug 02 00:30:00 2006 +0900
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void tpm_write_index(int b
 
 static inline u32 get_chip_buffersize(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 {
-	return chip->vendor->buffersize;
+	return chip->vendor.buffersize;
 }
 
 extern void tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *);

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe
>Hi Akio,
>	Thank you for your information. I am using the CSet34705 which should 
be 
>latest, and do you mean I should apply Aron''s patches on it. right?
In
>addition, what''s status about it? 
>BTW, 
>
>Thanks & Best Regards
>-Xiantao
>
>OTC,Intel Corporation
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@jp.fujitsu.com]
>> Sent: 2006年7月27日 16:47
>> To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela
>> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@redhat.com; Chris Wright;
>> fedora-ia64-list@redhat.com; xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5]
>> fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
>> 
>> Hi, Xiantao
>> 
>> BZ''s patch is old.
>> Today 139 cset is added to linux-2.6-xen-fedora tree.
>> So I think we should use Aron''s patches.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Akio Takebe
>> 
>> >Hi Aron,
>> >	Could you share me the current status for fedora-xen-ia64? Through
your
>> 
>> >mails, I see we should focus our efforts on linux-2.6-xen-fedora.
But when
>> >I applied the patch 199684 on it, conflicts occurs. Do you have any
>> >suggestion for contributing to Fedora ?
>> >Thanks & Best Regards
>> >-Xiantao
>> >
>> >OTC,Intel Corporation
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com
>> [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com]
>> >> On Behalf Of Aron Griffis
>> >> Sent: 2006ト・ヤツ27ネユ 12:11
>> >> To: Juan Quintela
>> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@redhat.com; Chris Wright;
>> >> fedora-ia64-list@redhat.com; Alex Williamson;
>> >> xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> >> Subject: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fix linux-2.6-xen-fedora
on ia64
>> >>
>> >> Hi Juan,
>> >>
>> >> These patches are the result of Akio, Prarit, Alex and me
working on
>> >> fixing
>> >> the
>> >> ia64 build of your tree.  At this point the bare-metal Linux
kernel
>> >> builds and
>> >> boots.  The xen kernel builds but doesn''t complete
booting.
>> >> Nonetheless,
>> >> since
>> >> these patches seem to take us most of the way there,
we''d like to
>> >> request
>> >>  them
>> >> to be applied to your tree.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Aron
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>> >Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

Akio,

I intentionally omitted this from what I submitted to Juan because the
rpm currently backs out ALL the xen modifications to the tpm code.
But you''re right... to build from linux-2.6-xen-fedora-ia64, you need
to either (1) apply this patch, or (2) disable tpm in the config.

Aron

Akio Takebe wrote:  [Thu Jul 27 2006, 05:35:34AM EDT]
> diff -r 61b945565398 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h	Wed Jul 26 17:22:38 2006 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h	Wed Aug 02 00:30:00 2006 +0900
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void tpm_write_index(int b
>  
>  static inline u32 get_chip_buffersize(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
> -	return chip->vendor->buffersize;
> +	return chip->vendor.buffersize;
>  }
>  
>  extern void tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *);