git trees: firewire - commented out, pending didn''t apply ext4 - commented out, seems upstream wireless - mostly upstream, pending didn''t apply M linux-2.6-acpi-eeepc-hotkey.patch fixed rejects M linux-2.6-e1000-corrupt-eeprom-checksum.patch somewhat upstream... i merged-ish it, upstream version needs you to reset the mac address with "ip" which is kind of loss. why has nobody root-caused this failure yet? :/ R linux-2.6-agp-mm.patch upstream R linux-2.6-alsa-rc4-mm1.patch R linux-2.6-alsa-support-sis7019.patch upstream (obviously :) M linux-2.6-build-nonintconfig.patch M linux-2.6-compile-fix-gcc-43.patch M linux-2.6-crash-driver.patch fixed rejects R linux-2.6-dcdbas-autoload.patch upstream M linux-2.6-debug-no-quiet.patch M linux-2.6-debug-sizeof-structs.patch M linux-2.6-debug-taint-vm.patch more rejects M linux-2.6-devmem.patch fixed rejects... maybe needs merging upstream R linux-2.6-drm-mm.patch R linux-2.6-drm-radeon-update.patch R linux-2.6-git-initial-r500-drm.patch upstream M linux-2.6-execshield.patch rejects fixed (hopefully) R linux-2.6-futex-fix-fixups.patch upstream M linux-2.6-gelic-fixups.patch M linux-2.6-input-kill-stupid-messages.patch M linux-2.6-lirc.patch M linux-2.6-silence-noise.patch M linux-2.6-squashfs.patch trivial rejects M linux-2.6-i386-vdso-install-unstripped-copies-on-disk.patch needs a bit of inspection, looks right (and builds ok) R linux-2.6-libata-pegasos-fix.patch upstream R linux-2.6-netdev-bonding-fix-null-deref.patch R linux-2.6-pasemi-for-2.6.25.patch R linux-2.6-pasemi-reserve-i2c.patch R linux-2.6-powerpc-bootwrapper.patch R linux-2.6-powerpc-generic-suspend-001-pmu-no-lock-kernel.patch R linux-2.6-powerpc-generic-suspend-002-pmu-remove-dead-code.patch R linux-2.6-powerpc-generic-suspend-003-remove-adb-sleep-notifier.patch R linux-2.6-powerpc-generic-suspend-004-kill-pmu-sleep-notifier.patch R linux-2.6-powerpc-generic-suspend-005-proper-sleep-management.patch R linux-2.6-unexport-symbols.patch upstream R linux-2.6-rndis_wlan.patch upstream? M linux-2.6-utrace-core.patch M linux-2.6-utrace-tracehook.patch pull-upstream.sh didn''t fix this... so commented out in the build R linux-2.6-xfs-optimize-away-realtime-tests.patch R linux-2.6-xfs-setfattr-32bit-compat.patch R linux-2.6-xfs-xfs_mount-refactor.patch upstream(?) M nouveau-drm.patch rejects fixed... maybe should be updated... airlied? M sources M upstream
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:53:40PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > M linux-2.6-e1000-corrupt-eeprom-checksum.patch > > somewhat upstream... i merged-ish it, upstream version needs you to > reset the mac address with "ip" which is kind of loss. why has nobody > root-caused this failure yet? :/ I spoke with DaveM about this at LCA. Aparently we don''t need it anymore. > M linux-2.6-devmem.patch > > fixed rejects... maybe needs merging upstream needs to be dropped in favour of the version arjan is pushing upstream (might be too late for .25, but probable .26 material) Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 12:53 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:> somewhat upstream... i merged-ish it, upstream version needs you to > reset the mac address with "ip" which is kind of loss. why has nobody > root-caused this failure yet? :/The root cause, at least for me, was that the motherboard has crappy shielding and swapping video cards is sufficient to taze the EEPROM. - ajax
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:53:40 pm Kyle McMartin wrote:> git trees: > firewire - commented out, pending didn''t applyYeah, the pending bits depend on some bits that are in linux1394-git that haven''t yet made their way over to Linus, I believe. Figure I''ll just fix things up after the rebase. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@redhat.com
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:54:25PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:> On Monday 11 February 2008 12:53:40 pm Kyle McMartin wrote: > > git trees: > > firewire - commented out, pending didn''t apply > > Yeah, the pending bits depend on some bits that are in linux1394-git that > haven''t yet made their way over to Linus, I believe. Figure I''ll just fix > things up after the rebase. >if you want, you can attach a diff here and i''ll put it into the first upload, or commit it with something like pending-rc1.patch or something and i''ll move it when we update. cheers, kyle
> M linux-2.6-i386-vdso-install-unstripped-copies-on-disk.patch > > needs a bit of inspection, looks right (and builds ok)This one should be upstream now. If anything is still missing, I should be able to get it in for 2.6.25.> M linux-2.6-utrace-core.patch > M linux-2.6-utrace-tracehook.patch > > pull-upstream.sh didn''t fix this... so commented out in the buildI''m behind on the rebasing. Just leave it for me to sort out. Thanks, Roland
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:50:00PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:> > M linux-2.6-i386-vdso-install-unstripped-copies-on-disk.patch > > > > needs a bit of inspection, looks right (and builds ok) > > This one should be upstream now. If anything is still missing, I should be > able to get it in for 2.6.25. >I needed the following patch to be able to build the fedora rpms on i386. This is likely a case of the new code doing the right thing, but me not being able to figure out the debug stuff in the spec file at the time though. cheers, Kyle diff --git a/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile b/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile index d28dda5..dcbca17 100644 --- a/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/vdso/Makefile @@ -7,8 +7,9 @@ VDSO32-$(CONFIG_X86_32) := y VDSO32-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) := y vdso-install-$(VDSO64-y) += vdso.so -vdso-install-$(VDSO32-y) += $(vdso32-y:=.so) - +vdso-install-$(VDSO32-y) += vdso32-sysenter.so $(vdso32-y:=.so) +vdso-install-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += vdso32-int80.so +vdso-install-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += vdso32-syscall.so # files to link into the vdso vobjs-y := vdso-note.o vclock_gettime.o vgetcpu.o vvar.o
> I needed the following patch to be able to build the fedora rpms > on i386. This is likely a case of the new code doing the right thing, > but me not being able to figure out the debug stuff in the spec file > at the time though.I sent a fix upstream for that. Thanks, Roland
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:39:09PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:> > I needed the following patch to be able to build the fedora rpms > > on i386. This is likely a case of the new code doing the right thing, > > but me not being able to figure out the debug stuff in the spec file > > at the time though. > > I sent a fix upstream for that. >great. thanks! cheers, kyle
On Monday 11 February 2008 02:01:01 pm Kyle McMartin wrote:> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:54:25PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Monday 11 February 2008 12:53:40 pm Kyle McMartin wrote: > > > git trees: > > > firewire - commented out, pending didn''t apply > > > > Yeah, the pending bits depend on some bits that are in linux1394-git that > > haven''t yet made their way over to Linus, I believe. Figure I''ll just fix > > things up after the rebase. > > if you want, you can attach a diff here and i''ll put it into the first > upload, or commit it with something like pending-rc1.patch or something > and i''ll move it when we update.Didn''t get back around to it until the new bits were already in cvs, but have since fixed things up, so its all good now. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@redhat.com