Hi Folks, I''ve been looking at upgrading the version of libpam-passthru-plugin.so that we use, we are using v 1.1.3 from an older version of Fedora Directory Server on our RHDS 8.0 Install, I noticed that v 1.2.2 is available in 389 on Fedora 11, and thought it might be useful to upgrade my version of the Plugin. Are there any Pros/Con''s to using a newer version of the plug in? Thanks! Tim
Tim Hartmann wrote:> Hi Folks, > > I''ve been looking at upgrading the version of libpam-passthru-plugin.so > that we use, we are using v 1.1.3 from an older version of Fedora > Directory Server on our RHDS 8.0 Install, I noticed that v 1.2.2 is > available in 389 on Fedora 11, and thought it might be useful to upgrade > my version of the Plugin. Are there any Pros/Con''s to using a newer > version of the plug in? >You want to use the pam passthrough plugin from 389 1.2.2 Fedora 11 with 1.1.3? There are binaries for EL5.> Thanks! > > Tim > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >
Rich Megginson wrote:> Tim Hartmann wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I''ve been looking at upgrading the version of libpam-passthru-plugin.so >> that we use, we are using v 1.1.3 from an older version of Fedora >> Directory Server on our RHDS 8.0 Install, I noticed that v 1.2.2 is >> available in 389 on Fedora 11, and thought it might be useful to upgrade >> my version of the Plugin. Are there any Pros/Con''s to using a newer >> version of the plug in? >> >> > You want to use the pam passthrough plugin from 389 1.2.2 Fedora 11 with > 1.1.3? There are binaries for EL5. >Could you point me in the right direction to get the binaries? I asked for guidance through our support channel and they claimed they didn''t support the pam-passthru-plugin. I''ve been having sporatic problems with the dirsrv daemon dieing and they thought it may be in relation to the pam-passthru-plugin Thanks for the help Rich! Tim
Tim Hartmann wrote:> Rich Megginson wrote: >> Tim Hartmann wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> I''ve been looking at upgrading the version of libpam-passthru-plugin.so >>> that we use, we are using v 1.1.3 from an older version of Fedora >>> Directory Server on our RHDS 8.0 Install, I noticed that v 1.2.2 is >>> available in 389 on Fedora 11, and thought it might be useful to >>> upgrade >>> my version of the Plugin. Are there any Pros/Con''s to using a newer >>> version of the plug in? >>> >> You want to use the pam passthrough plugin from 389 1.2.2 Fedora 11 >> with 1.1.3? There are binaries for EL5. >> > Could you point me in the right direction to get the binaries? I > asked for guidance through our support channel and they claimed they > didn''t support the pam-passthru-plugin.pam passthrough plugin is not supported for Red Hat Directory Server. It is supported for 389 Directory Server. You can use the 389 EL5 binary pam passthrough plugin with Red Hat Directory Server on EL5, but you may run afoul of Red Hat support if you do that.> I''ve been having sporatic problems with the dirsrv daemon dieing and > they thought it may be in relation to the pam-passthru-plugin > > Thanks for the help Rich! > > Tim > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Rich Megginson wrote:> >>>> >>>> >>> You want to use the pam passthrough plugin from 389 1.2.2 Fedora 11 >>> with 1.1.3? There are binaries for EL5. >>> >>> >> Could you point me in the right direction to get the binaries? I >> asked for guidance through our support channel and they claimed they >> didn''t support the pam-passthru-plugin. >> > pam passthrough plugin is not supported for Red Hat Directory Server. > It is supported for 389 Directory Server. You can use the 389 EL5 > binary pam passthrough plugin with Red Hat Directory Server on EL5, but > you may run afoul of Red Hat support if you do that. >Thanks! Where can I get the binaries for EL5? I''ve googled around and looked on the 389 wiki, but I can''t seem to locate them... I''d rather use something closer to what I *should* be using!
Tim Hartmann wrote:> Rich Megginson wrote: >> >>>>> >>>> You want to use the pam passthrough plugin from 389 1.2.2 Fedora 11 >>>> with 1.1.3? There are binaries for EL5. >>>> >>> Could you point me in the right direction to get the binaries? I >>> asked for guidance through our support channel and they claimed they >>> didn''t support the pam-passthru-plugin. >>> >> pam passthrough plugin is not supported for Red Hat Directory >> Server. It is supported for 389 Directory Server. You can use the >> 389 EL5 binary pam passthrough plugin with Red Hat Directory Server >> on EL5, but you may run afoul of Red Hat support if you do that. >> > > Thanks! Where can I get the binaries for EL5? I''ve googled around and > looked on the 389 wiki, but I can''t seem to locate them... I''d rather > use something closer to what I *should* be using!http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Download#Enterprise_Linux_5> > > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users