Fedora directory users - Jun 2008 - Announcing Fedora Directory Server version 1.1.1

We are pleased to announce the release of Fedora Directory Server 
1.1.1.  This release is primarily a bug fix release, but does contain 
some new features, mostly to support freeIPA.

Binary packages are available for Fedora 7, 8, 9, and rawhide.  NOTE:  
Fedora 6/RHEL5 binaries are not yet available.  They will be shortly.

How to upgrade:

 yum upgrade fedora-ds-base

No further setup should be required.  This should restart the server - 
if not, a manual restart (service dirsrv restart) is required for the 
new code to take effect.

* Release Notes - http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes

Rich,

We''re about to start testing an implementation of FDS-1.1.1, but we
have
a query about packaging dates:

The update RPMs available for Fedora 8 (which we plan to use) seem to 
have build dates prior to this release announcement. Is this to be 
expected, e.g. did the F8 RPMs get built prior to release but with the 
release code? We just want to make sure we''re using the best possible 
code here.

Many TIA,

Danny

Rich Megginson wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the release of Fedora Directory Server 
> 1.1.1.  This release is primarily a bug fix release, but does contain 
> some new features, mostly to support freeIPA.
>
> Binary packages are available for Fedora 7, 8, 9, and rawhide.  NOTE:  
> Fedora 6/RHEL5 binaries are not yet available.  They will be shortly.
>
> How to upgrade:
>
> yum upgrade fedora-ds-base
>
> No further setup should be required.  This should restart the server - 
> if not, a manual restart (service dirsrv restart) is required for the 
> new code to take effect.
>
> * Release Notes - http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>

Danny Smith wrote:
> Rich,
>
> We''re about to start testing an implementation of FDS-1.1.1, but
we
> have a query about packaging dates:
>
> The update RPMs available for Fedora 8 (which we plan to use) seem to 
> have build dates prior to this release announcement. Is this to be 
> expected, e.g. did the F8 RPMs get built prior to release but with the 
> release code?
Yes.  There is some delay between the time the code is tagged in CVS, 
the source tarballs are built, the source rpms are built, the rpms are 
built in koji (the Fedora build system), and the rpms are pushed out to 
all of the fedora mirrors (via bodhi).
> We just want to make sure we''re using the best possible code here.
The source from http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Source should be 
the same as the source tarball in the source rpm.
>
> Many TIA,
>
> Danny
>
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> We are pleased to announce the release of Fedora Directory Server 
>> 1.1.1.  This release is primarily a bug fix release, but does contain 
>> some new features, mostly to support freeIPA.
>>
>> Binary packages are available for Fedora 7, 8, 9, and rawhide.  
>> NOTE:  Fedora 6/RHEL5 binaries are not yet available.  They will be 
>> shortly.
>>
>> How to upgrade:
>>
>> yum upgrade fedora-ds-base
>>
>> No further setup should be required.  This should restart the server 
>> - if not, a manual restart (service dirsrv restart) is required for 
>> the new code to take effect.
>>
>> * Release Notes - http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
>> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>