Ken Marsh
2008-Mar-10 15:12 UTC
[Fedora-directory-users] YUM and 64 bit upgrade to 1.1 questions
Hi, I have some questions upgrading 3 Red Hat systems (ES3, 4 x86 & ES5x86_64, one each) from FDS 1.01-4 to 1.1. 1. On RHES5.1 x86_64, is it safe to do yum to update the installation? There are a lot of warnings out there about yum vs Beta of 1.1. Should I remove all of 1.01-4 first? 2. Should I be using redhat-ds instead of fedora-ds for supported RH systems? 3. Searching for packages in rhn.redhat.com, there is no redhat-ds available. Shouldn''t it be there? I have entitlements for 3, 4 and 5. 4. Must I use YUM for Enterprise 4 systems? Why can''t I just download an FDS 1.1 RPM and install it? It would be much easier than converting E4 systems to YUM. 5. If I must use YUM, is there some EASY, STRAIGHTFORWARD instructions for installing YUM on ES4? Everything out there seems to assume I am setting up some grand upgrade redistribution engine when all I want is a few packages. Ken Marsh ANS System Administration Lead (410) 876-9200
Rich Megginson
2008-Mar-10 15:20 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] YUM and 64 bit upgrade to 1.1 questions
Ken Marsh wrote:> > Hi, > > I have some questions upgrading 3 Red Hat systems (ES3, 4 x86 & > ES5x86_64, one each) from FDS 1.01-4 to 1.1. > > 1. On RHES5.1 x86_64, is it safe to do yum to update the > installation? There are a lot of warnings out there about yum vs > Beta of 1.1. Should I remove all of 1.01-4 first? >Either way is fine. Just be sure to backup your data (db2bak, db2ldif) and your config (slapd-instance/config) before you upgrade.> > 1. > > > 2. Should I be using redhat-ds instead of fedora-ds for supported > RH systems? >Red Hat Directory Server is not free - you have to purchase a separate subscription/entitlement. If you would like to purchase Red Hat DS, please contact me off list.> > 1. > > > 2. Searching for packages in rhn.redhat.com, there is no redhat-ds > available. Shouldn’t it be there? I have entitlements for 3, 4 > and 5. >See above.> > 1. > > > 2. Must I use YUM for Enterprise 4 systems? Why can’t I just > download an FDS 1.1 RPM and install it? >There is no FDS 1.1 RPM for EL4.> > 1. It would be much easier than converting E4 systems to YUM. > 2. If I must use YUM, is there some EASY, STRAIGHTFORWARD > instructions for installing YUM on ES4? Everything out there > seems to assume I am setting up some grand upgrade > redistribution engine when all I want is a few packages. >> 1. > > > > Ken Marsh > > ANS System Administration Lead > > (410) 876-9200 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >
Rob Crittenden
2008-Mar-10 15:41 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] YUM and 64 bit upgrade to 1.1 questions
Rich Megginson wrote:> Ken Marsh wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have some questions upgrading 3 Red Hat systems (ES3, 4 x86 & >> ES5x86_64, one each) from FDS 1.01-4 to 1.1. >> >> 1. On RHES5.1 x86_64, is it safe to do yum to update the >> installation? There are a lot of warnings out there about yum vs >> Beta of 1.1. Should I remove all of 1.01-4 first? >> > Either way is fine. Just be sure to backup your data (db2bak, db2ldif) > and your config (slapd-instance/config) before you upgrade. >> >> 1. >> >> >> 2. Should I be using redhat-ds instead of fedora-ds for supported >> RH systems? >> > Red Hat Directory Server is not free - you have to purchase a separate > subscription/entitlement. If you would like to purchase Red Hat DS, > please contact me off list. >> >> 1. >> >> >> 2. Searching for packages in rhn.redhat.com, there is no redhat-ds >> available. Shouldn’t it be there? I have entitlements for 3, 4 >> and 5. >> > See above. >> >> 1. >> >> >> 2. Must I use YUM for Enterprise 4 systems? Why can’t I just >> download an FDS 1.1 RPM and install it? >> > There is no FDS 1.1 RPM for EL4.As an aside, up2date supports yum repos to some extent. If you look in /etc/sysconfig/sources (I think) you''ll see some syntax for it. rob