This is, in a way, entirely inconsequential from a functional stand-point but: I performed an upgrade from 1.0.2 to1.0.3. The upgrade went fine (except the permissions on ~/slapd-blah/config and ~/slapd-blah/logs had to be changed back to what they were suppose to be) but when I start the console it shows a directory server version number of 1.0.2. Where is it getting that? /opt/fedora-ds/bin/slapd/server/ns-slapd showes Fedora-Directory/1.0.3 B2006.303.1845.
Jason Russler wrote:> This is, in a way, entirely inconsequential from a functional > stand-point but: > I performed an upgrade from 1.0.2 to1.0.3. The upgrade went fine > (except the permissions on ~/slapd-blah/config and ~/slapd-blah/logs > had to be changed back to what they were suppose to be) but when I > start the console it shows a directory server version number of > 1.0.2. Where is it getting that? > /opt/fedora-ds/bin/slapd/server/ns-slapd showes > Fedora-Directory/1.0.3 B2006.303.1845.I think it''s because when you get the permission problem during setup (are you using SSL at all?), the upgrade process doesn''t upgrade the ds version that the console uses. The authoritative version is the one reported by ns-slapd.> -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
I am testing a multi master replication. The replication agreements between host a and b are setup. When I add an entry to a replicated subtree from host a the new entry is also visible on host b when I browse host b. This works as I expect, however, when I delete this entry from host b login, the entry is not visible on host b, but it is still visible in host a. I am running FDS 1.0.2 and Fedora 5. Should the entry be removed from both servers? Thank you in advance, Gene Liberman
Richard Megginson
2006-Nov-06 20:56 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Multi Master replication
Eugene M Liberman wrote:> > I am testing a multi master replication. The replication agreements > between host a and b are setup. When I add an entry to a replicated > subtree from host a the new entry is also visible on host b when I > browse host b. This works as I expect, however, when I delete this > entry from host b login, the entry is not visible on host b, but it is > still visible in host a. I am running FDS 1.0.2 and Fedora 5.What are you using to verify visibility? Note that the console may not refresh immediately.> > Should the entry be removed from both servers? > > Thank you in advance, > > Gene Liberman > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >
Eugene M Liberman
2006-Nov-07 14:50 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Multi Master replication
fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 11/06/2006 03:56:20 PM:> Eugene M Liberman wrote: > > > > I am testing a multi master replication. The replication agreements > > between host a and b are setup. When I add an entry to a replicated > > subtree from host a the new entry is also visible on host b when I > > browse host b. This works as I expect, however, when I delete this > > entry from host b login, the entry is not visible on host b, but it is> > still visible in host a. I am running FDS 1.0.2 and Fedora 5. > What are you using to verify visibility? Note that the console may not > refresh immediately.I use JXplorer. I logged out and logged back on again. It never updated. The error log contains this: [06/Nov/2006:13:46:27 -0500] - Fedora-Directory/1.0.2 B2006.101.2016 starting up [06/Nov/2006:13:46:27 -0500] - I''m resizing my cache now...cache was 20000000 and is now 8388608 [06/Nov/2006:13:46:29 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - replica_check_for_data_reload: Warning: data for replica dc=Multi Master For 389 and 10389 was reloaded and it no longer matches the data in the changelog (replica data > changelog). Recreating the changelog file. This could affect replication with replica''s consumers in which case the consumers should be reinitialized. [06/Nov/2006:13:46:29 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a different generation ID than the local data. [06/Nov/2006:13:46:29 -0500] - slapd started. Listening on All Interfaces port 389 for LDAP requests [06/Nov/2006:13:46:32 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a different generation ID than the local data. [06/Nov/2006:13:46:36 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a different generation ID than the local data. . . . . [06/Nov/2006:14:01:57 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a different generation ID than the local data. [06/Nov/2006:14:01:58 -0500] agmt="cn=Multi Master From 389 to 10389" (10:10389) - Can''t locate CSN 454f77240000000a0000 in the changelog (DB rc=-30990). The consumer may need to be reinitialized. [06/Nov/2006:14:02:00 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a different generation ID than the local data.> > > > Should the entry be removed from both servers? > > > > Thank you in advance, > > > > Gene Liberman > >------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > > -- > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > [attachment "smime.p7s" deleted by Eugene M > Liberman/NorthAmerica/RA/Rockwell] -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Richard Megginson
2006-Nov-07 15:19 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Multi Master replication
Eugene M Liberman wrote:> > > fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com wrote on 11/06/2006 03:56:20 PM: > > > Eugene M Liberman wrote: > > > > > > I am testing a multi master replication. The replication agreements > > > between host a and b are setup. When I add an entry to a replicated > > > subtree from host a the new entry is also visible on host b when I > > > browse host b. This works as I expect, however, when I delete this > > > entry from host b login, the entry is not visible on host b, but > it is > > > still visible in host a. I am running FDS 1.0.2 and Fedora 5. > > What are you using to verify visibility? Note that the console may not > > refresh immediately.Did you perform a replica initialization from host a to host b? The error log messages indicate that the initial sync hasn''t been done.> I use JXplorer. I logged out and logged back on again. It never > updated. The error log contains this:It''s possible that JXplorer is automatically following a referral from b to a or vice versa if the replica hasn''t been initialized.> > [06/Nov/2006:13:46:27 -0500] - Fedora-Directory/1.0.2 B2006.101.2016 > starting up > [06/Nov/2006:13:46:27 -0500] - I''m resizing my cache now...cache was > 20000000 and is now 8388608 > [06/Nov/2006:13:46:29 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > replica_check_for_data_reload: Warning: data for replica dc=Multi > Master For 389 and 10389 was reloaded and it no longer matches the > data in the changelog (replica data > changelog). Recreating the > changelog file. This could affect replication with replica''s consumers > in which case the consumers should be reinitialized. > [06/Nov/2006:13:46:29 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a > different generation ID than the local data. > [06/Nov/2006:13:46:29 -0500] - slapd started. Listening on All > Interfaces port 389 for LDAP requests > [06/Nov/2006:13:46:32 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a > different generation ID than the local data. > [06/Nov/2006:13:46:36 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a > different generation ID than the local data. > . > . > . > . > [06/Nov/2006:14:01:57 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a > different generation ID than the local data. > [06/Nov/2006:14:01:58 -0500] agmt="cn=Multi Master From 389 to 10389" > (10:10389) - Can''t locate CSN 454f77240000000a0000 in the changelog > (DB rc=-30990). The consumer may need to be reinitialized. > [06/Nov/2006:14:02:00 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > agmt="cn="Replication to 10.88.52.110"" (10:389): Replica has a > different generation ID than the local data. > > > > > > > Should the entry be removed from both servers? > > > > > > Thank you in advance, > > > > > > Gene Liberman > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > > > [attachment "smime.p7s" deleted by Eugene M > > Liberman/NorthAmerica/RA/Rockwell] -- > > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >