Jo De Troy wrote:> Hello, > > I was wondering when a next official release will be available.We don''t really know yet. We were hoping to have a beta of version 1.1 available within the next couple of weeks. This would be the new packaging of just the core DS i.e. the beta wouldn''t have the admin server, console, etc.> > Kind Regards, > Jo > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Gordon Messmer wrote:> Richard Megginson wrote: >> Jo De Troy wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I was wondering when a next official release will be available. >> We don''t really know yet. We were hoping to have a beta of version >> 1.1 available within the next couple of weeks. This would be the new >> packaging of just the core DS i.e. the beta wouldn''t have the admin >> server, console, etc. > > Will there be a 1.0.3?We hadn''t planned on it. Is there a lot of demand? Would it be possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if we do?> I like the packaging well enough as it is, and would like to see an > official release with the SASL encryption fix that was just checked > into CVS. > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Hello, I was wondering when a next official release will be available. Kind Regards, Jo
Richard Megginson wrote:> Jo De Troy wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I was wondering when a next official release will be available. > We don''t really know yet. We were hoping to have a beta of version > 1.1 available within the next couple of weeks. This would be the new > packaging of just the core DS i.e. the beta wouldn''t have the admin > server, console, etc.Will there be a 1.0.3? I like the packaging well enough as it is, and would like to see an official release with the SASL encryption fix that was just checked into CVS.
Richard Megginson wrote:> Gordon Messmer wrote: >> Will there be a 1.0.3? > We hadn''t planned on it. Is there a lot of demand? Would it be > possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if we do?Can''t speak for the level of demand, but I''d like to see a 1.0.x version that didn''t break when using GSSAPI. Maybe that''s just because I don''t know what else is changing for 1.1. I''m running 1.0.2 on RHEL 4.
Richard Megginson wrote:> We hadn''t planned on it. Is there a lot of demand? Would it be > possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if we do?I''d like to see support for RHEL3 continued. David
>> We hadn''t planned on it. Is there a lot of demand? Would it be >> possible to drop support for RHEL3 and Fedora Core 4 if we do?I still have a lot of sites running FC3, simply because it''s the last release with PHP 4 and PHP 5 breaks the PEAR LDAP module. If you are going to support RHEL 4 then you may as well support FC3. OTOH most of my FC4 sites have moved up to FC5. -- Del Babel Com Australia http://www.babel.com.au/ ph: 02 9368 0728 fax: 02 9368 0758