mj@sci.fi
2006-Aug-08 14:19 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Help with the directory server locking up
Michael Thomsen <mikerthomsen@gmail.com> kirjoitti:> NDS 6.11 > Solars 9/05 > > The only patch that we have installed so far is the patch cluster for > Solaris 9 from Feb 3, 2006. It''s not running replication and is being > used in basically a default installation sort of configuration. The > application that uses it is a simple Java client, nothing that should > be causing any problems. This is something new that has appeared out > of the blue.JNDI has, or used to have, a bug which sends LDAP controls with every operation. IIRC, a workaround can be made in the client code telling JNDI not to use the control. This may or may not help you, but worth noting. The problem and solution, as I found about 1-2 years ago, is listed in one OpenLDAP mailing list message, but I couldn''t find it just now. Anyhow, you can see see the buggy JNDI behaviour I am referring to if you sniff the packets with ethereal. BR, -- mike
Michael Thomsen
2006-Aug-08 14:20 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Help with the directory server locking up
Thanks. I''ll forward this to the guys I work with! On 8/8/06, mj@sci.fi <mj@sci.fi> wrote:> Michael Thomsen <mikerthomsen@gmail.com> kirjoitti: > > NDS 6.11 > > Solars 9/05 > > > > The only patch that we have installed so far is the patch cluster for > > Solaris 9 from Feb 3, 2006. It''s not running replication and is being > > used in basically a default installation sort of configuration. The > > application that uses it is a simple Java client, nothing that should > > be causing any problems. This is something new that has appeared out > > of the blue. > > JNDI has, or used to have, a bug which sends LDAP controls with every operation. IIRC, a workaround can be made in the client code telling JNDI not to use the control. This may or may not help you, but worth noting. > > The problem and solution, as I found about 1-2 years ago, is listed in one OpenLDAP mailing list message, but I couldn''t find it just now. Anyhow, you can see see the buggy JNDI behaviour I am referring to if you sniff the packets with ethereal. > > > BR, > -- > mike > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >