I have just started using the Fedora-DS. I have to say that I am very impressed. I currently am turning my attention towards working with the server on a SE Linux platform. However, I was wondering if it is best to keep with the current static version that is provided via the source download site, or could I get the latest and greatest to see how in integrates. Thanks in advance and I look forward to my participation with all of you on this project..
Scott Boggs wrote:> I have just started using the Fedora-DS. I have to say that I am very > impressed. I currently am turning my attention towards working with > the server on a SE Linux platform. However, I was wondering if it is > best to keep with the current static version that is provided via the > source download site, or could I get the latest and greatest to see > how in integrates.We will be releasing a new binary version very soon.> > Thanks in advance and I look forward to my participation with all of > you on this project.. > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
Rich Megginson wrote:> Scott Boggs wrote: > >> I have just started using the Fedora-DS. I have to say that I am very >> impressed. I currently am turning my attention towards working with >> the server on a SE Linux platform. However, I was wondering if it is >> best to keep with the current static version that is provided via the >> source download site, or could I get the latest and greatest to see >> how in integrates. > > > We will be releasing a new binary version very soon. >Could you tell what will be in the new build? and a date? It would be cool if the build process could be cleanly separated. For example, it should be easy to build the directory server alone, and build the admin and console alone. That would be easier for other people to participate too. It''s not too scary that way, coz the whole thing is pretty big. rgds csp -- Chen Shaopeng http://www.idsignet.com
Chen Shaopeng wrote:>Rich Megginson wrote: > > >>Scott Boggs wrote: >> >> >> >>>I have just started using the Fedora-DS. I have to say that I am very >>>impressed. I currently am turning my attention towards working with >>>the server on a SE Linux platform. However, I was wondering if it is >>>best to keep with the current static version that is provided via the >>>source download site, or could I get the latest and greatest to see >>>how in integrates. >>> >>> >>We will be releasing a new binary version very soon. >> >> >> > >Could you tell what will be in the new build? and a date? > >We will be making an official announcement within the week, but the new build will have MD5, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512 password support. It will also contain lots of bug fixes, many of which are in the windows sync component.>It would be cool if the build process could be cleanly separated. >For example, it should be easy to build the directory server >alone, and build the admin and console alone. > >The build right now builds the directory server alone, and you can build the console alone as well. See the http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/Building for more information.>That would be easier for other people to participate too. >It''s not too scary that way, coz the whole thing is pretty >big. > >rgds > >csp > >