David Clements
2008-Aug-14 17:12 UTC
[Facebooker-talk] Any requests that don''t need a session
I am looking into my issue with refreshRefUrl and am trying to find a case where we make calls that don''t require or use a session key. Anyone know if we have any cases of this? Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/facebooker-talk/attachments/20080814/b905a302/attachment.html>
I don''t know for sure but this blog mentions that sessions are optional in some api calls: http://junal.wordpress.com/ "API Calls: For many calls, session keys are now optional. If you continue to pass valid session keys, FB''ll ignore them. FB recommends you remove session keys from the appropriate calls now." Zhao On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:12 AM, David Clements <digidigo at gmail.com> wrote:> I am looking into my issue with refreshRefUrl and am trying to find a case > where we make calls that don''t require or use a session key. Anyone know > if we have any cases of this? > > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > Facebooker-talk mailing list > Facebooker-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/facebooker-talk > >-- Zhao
Mike Mangino
2008-Aug-15 13:01 UTC
[Facebooker-talk] Any requests that don''t need a session
Yeah, just send false as the last parameter to Session#post Mike On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:12 PM, David Clements wrote:> I am looking into my issue with refreshRefUrl and am trying to find > a case where we make calls that don''t require or use a session > key. Anyone know if we have any cases of this? > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > Facebooker-talk mailing list > Facebooker-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/facebooker-talk-- Mike Mangino http://www.elevatedrails.com
David Clements
2008-Aug-15 15:58 UTC
[Facebooker-talk] Any requests that don''t need a session
Okay, So it looks like to me that the refreshRefUrl will need this added. Can anyone else confirm what I am seeing? Dave On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Mike Mangino <mmangino at elevatedrails.com>wrote:> Yeah, just send false as the last parameter to Session#post > > Mike > > On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:12 PM, David Clements wrote: > > I am looking into my issue with refreshRefUrl and am trying to find a case >> where we make calls that don''t require or use a session key. Anyone know >> if we have any cases of this? >> >> Dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Facebooker-talk mailing list >> Facebooker-talk at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/facebooker-talk >> > > -- > Mike Mangino > http://www.elevatedrails.com > > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/facebooker-talk/attachments/20080815/722747d3/attachment.html>
Mike Mangino
2008-Aug-15 16:47 UTC
[Facebooker-talk] Any requests that don''t need a session
I would recommend avoiding refresh_ref_url where possible. We''ve found it to be really temperamental. We''ve had much better luck with handle refs. That said, it looks like a good fix. Will it break Bebo? Mike On Aug 15, 2008, at 11:58 AM, David Clements wrote:> Okay, > > So it looks like to me that the refreshRefUrl will need this > added. Can anyone else confirm what I am seeing? > > Dave > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Mike Mangino <mmangino at elevatedrails.com > > wrote: > Yeah, just send false as the last parameter to Session#post > > Mike > > > On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:12 PM, David Clements wrote: > > I am looking into my issue with refreshRefUrl and am trying to find > a case where we make calls that don''t require or use a session > key. Anyone know if we have any cases of this? > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > Facebooker-talk mailing list > Facebooker-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/facebooker-talk > > -- > Mike Mangino > http://www.elevatedrails.com > > > >-- Mike Mangino http://www.elevatedrails.com
David Clements
2008-Aug-15 16:48 UTC
[Facebooker-talk] Any requests that don''t need a session
I''ll test the setRefHandle call as well. And yes, I think bebo will need to have a monkey patch in the adapter. dave On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Mike Mangino <mmangino at elevatedrails.com>wrote:> I would recommend avoiding refresh_ref_url where possible. We''ve found it > to be really temperamental. We''ve had much better luck with handle refs. > That said, it looks like a good fix. Will it break Bebo? > > Mike > > > On Aug 15, 2008, at 11:58 AM, David Clements wrote: > > Okay, >> >> So it looks like to me that the refreshRefUrl will need this added. Can >> anyone else confirm what I am seeing? >> >> Dave >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Mike Mangino <mmangino at elevatedrails.com> >> wrote: >> Yeah, just send false as the last parameter to Session#post >> >> Mike >> >> >> On Aug 14, 2008, at 1:12 PM, David Clements wrote: >> >> I am looking into my issue with refreshRefUrl and am trying to find a case >> where we make calls that don''t require or use a session key. Anyone know >> if we have any cases of this? >> >> Dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Facebooker-talk mailing list >> Facebooker-talk at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/facebooker-talk >> >> -- >> Mike Mangino >> http://www.elevatedrails.com >> >> >> >> >> > -- > Mike Mangino > http://www.elevatedrails.com > > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/facebooker-talk/attachments/20080815/c0307a96/attachment.html>