Ext3 users - Jul 2007 - Ext3 fsck questions

Hi,

  I am currently having a RAID disk configured to appear as
3 ext3 disks (/dev/sda,/dev/sdb and /dev/sdc)

The disks are initially formatted using

mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda

and mounted as follows

mount -t ext3 -o data=ordered -o commit=1 /dev/sda /mnt/san
>From what I read from the man page and other maillist archives I must run
fsck
periodically  ( default after 38 mounts or 6 months) to ensure the
filesystem is clean.

Is this still valid if I mount using the following options?

-o data=ordered -o commit=1


Thanks
Ramesh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20070710/96b9f164/attachment.htm>

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Ramesh Natarajan wrote:
> and mounted as follows
> mount -t ext3 -o data=ordered -o commit=1 /dev/sda /mnt/san
data=ordered seems to be the default anyway.
> From what I read from the man page and other maillist archives I must run
> fsck periodically  ( default after 38 mounts or 6 months) to ensure the
> filesystem is clean.
> Is this still valid if I mount using the following options?
It's recommended to run e2fsck once in a while (otherwise there would be 
no need for the 'max-mount-count' and 'interval-between-checks' 
tunables). But since it's a tunable you can of course turn it off.

Really, there is not definite answer here. I for one use e2fsck once in 
a while and see it more as a datapoint ("fs was OK on 2007-07-15") or 
as a mere sanity check :)

C.
-- 
BOFH excuse #146:

Communications satellite used by the military for star wars.