Hi Devs, I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive and doc''s again.... I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work from there. My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? a) email to the list b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest gem)? c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal RDoc example to be preferred)? d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be offline)? Cheers Mark
On Jan 3, 2008 6:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi Devs, > I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in > <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. > To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive and > doc''s again.... > I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some > ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work from > there. > My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? > a) email to the list > b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest gem)? > c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal RDoc > example to be preferred)? > d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be > offline)? >Kirk Haines has been thinking about how we can greatly improve the documentation and support materials for EM, including soliciting help from the community on all the above. Kirk, would you like to take Mark''s question? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/eventmachine-talk/attachments/20080103/e059b6ff/attachment.html
I had been using the rubyforge wiki, though it looks like rubypub is a good idea. Somewhat hard to navigate, but hey :) We should probably make a concensus on something. My question is if the rubypub stuff will migrate wiki comments to the ''next version or if one would have to start over each time... Cheers. -Roger On Jan 3, 2008 4:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi Devs, > I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in > <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. > To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive and > doc''s again.... > I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some > ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work from > there. > My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? > a) email to the list > b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest gem)? > c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal RDoc > example to be preferred)? > d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be offline)? > > Cheers > Mark > _______________________________________________ > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk >-- -Roger Pack For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7
On Jan 3, 2008 8:54 AM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005 at gmail.com> wrote:> I had been using the rubyforge wiki, though it looks like rubypub is a > good idea. Somewhat hard to navigate, but hey :) > We should probably make a concensus on something. > My question is if the rubypub stuff will migrate wiki comments to the > ''next version or if one would have to start over each time... > Cheers. > -Roger > > On Jan 3, 2008 4:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Devs, > > I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in > > <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. > > To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive and > > doc''s again.... > > I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some > > ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work from > > there. > > My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? > > a) email to the list > > b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest gem)? > > c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal RDoc > > example to be preferred)? > > d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be > offline)? > > > > Cheers > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > -- > -Roger Pack > For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of > love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7 > _______________________________________________ > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk >Speaking of which, Francis, are you still interested in setting up Trac for rubyeventmachine.com? Jason -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/eventmachine-talk/attachments/20080103/f28430ca/attachment.html
On Jan 4, 2008 12:54 AM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005 at gmail.com> wrote:> I had been using the rubyforge wiki, though it looks like rubypub is a > good idea. Somewhat hard to navigate, but hey :) > We should probably make a concensus on something. > My question is if the rubypub stuff will migrate wiki comments to the > ''next version or if one would have to start over each time...My understanding is that rubypub is a ''convenient'' (web-browser only) way of adding to the source RDocs. If I understand correctly the project admin would get some sort of diff file with the additions/changes. So not sure if this route is more of a headache for the admins? Anyway, you are correct: Which is the first class doc citizen, the sources/Rdoc or some wiki? My 2c: Until a full release is made, rdocs, ./specs, ./samples/examples are the focus - during any RC type-phase parts of the these (rdoc, etc) can be moved into a wiki? Cheers> Cheers. > -Roger > > On Jan 3, 2008 4:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Devs, > > I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in > > <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. > > To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive and > > doc''s again.... > > I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some > > ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work from > > there. > > My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? > > a) email to the list > > b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest gem)? > > c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal RDoc > > example to be preferred)? > > d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be offline)? > > > > Cheers > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > -- > -Roger Pack > For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of > love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7 >
Yes, very interested in setting up Trac. Let''s discuss offlist. The source Rdocs are always the first class citizen. I don''t really know how well Rubypub works, in terms of getting timely diffs to project admins. If they actually do a good job, it''s possible that we can officially "bless" that method for making doc changes. But I''d prefer to see how well Trac works for us first. EM is rather an unusual project, as they go. That''s because it''s very large and heterogeneous. (The obvious comparison is to Python''s Twisted, which has also become really large, and also somewhat messy.) On one hand, this is good because it means there''s room for much more community participation and contributions than with projects that are more narrowly focused. On the other hand, it means we''ll need to be very disciplined at setting standards for code quality and for code-and-documentation style. I don''t want to throw rocks at other projects, so let me just say that we should learn from the mistakes that Twisted has made. I just started working on splitting out the EM event-reactor library into a self-contained unit that can be used from any language. This is largely true today, but there is a little bit of Ruby "glue" in the core reactor. (Not much.) This should reduce the pressure to integrate "foreign" event libraries, as well as make it easier to maintain the reactor core separately from the protocol implementations. On Jan 3, 2008 9:05 AM, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton at gmail.com> wrote:> On Jan 3, 2008 8:54 AM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I had been using the rubyforge wiki, though it looks like rubypub is a > > good idea. Somewhat hard to navigate, but hey :) > > We should probably make a concensus on something. > > My question is if the rubypub stuff will migrate wiki comments to the > > ''next version or if one would have to start over each time... > > Cheers. > > -Roger > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 4:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Devs, > > > I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in > > > <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. > > > To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive and > > > doc''s again.... > > > I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some > > > ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work from > > > there. > > > My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? > > > a) email to the list > > > b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest > > gem)? > > > c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal RDoc > > > example to be preferred)? > > > d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be > > offline)? > > > > > > Cheers > > > Mark > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -Roger Pack > > For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of > > love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7 > > _______________________________________________ > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > Speaking of which, Francis, are you still interested in setting up Trac > for rubyeventmachine.com ? > > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/eventmachine-talk/attachments/20080103/283860ac/attachment-0001.html
On Jan 3, 2008 4:25 AM, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10 at gmail.com> wrote:> On Jan 3, 2008 6:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote: > > Kirk Haines has been thinking about how we can greatly improve the > documentation and support materials for EM, including soliciting help from > the community on all the above. > > Kirk, would you like to take Mark''s question?Sure. I''m in the process of setting up rdoc from the latest release for rubyeventmachine.com, and figuring out how to manage enhancing the existing set of documents and examples. I''d love to see several people helping to flesh out the docs and examples so that rubyeventmachine.com becomes a first class web site and reference. Kirk Haines
maybe use rubypub as a drafting board for docs? Every so often have somebody sync useful ones to the real docs? On Jan 3, 2008 7:35 AM, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10 at gmail.com> wrote:> Yes, very interested in setting up Trac. Let''s discuss offlist. > > The source Rdocs are always the first class citizen. I don''t really know how > well Rubypub works, in terms of getting timely diffs to project admins. If > they actually do a good job, it''s possible that we can officially "bless" > that method for making doc changes. But I''d prefer to see how well Trac > works for us first. > > EM is rather an unusual project, as they go. That''s because it''s very large > and heterogeneous. (The obvious comparison is to Python''s Twisted, which has > also become really large, and also somewhat messy.) On one hand, this is > good because it means there''s room for much more community participation and > contributions than with projects that are more narrowly focused. > > On the other hand, it means we''ll need to be very disciplined at setting > standards for code quality and for code-and-documentation style. I don''t > want to throw rocks at other projects, so let me just say that we should > learn from the mistakes that Twisted has made. > > I just started working on splitting out the EM event-reactor library into a > self-contained unit that can be used from any language. This is largely true > today, but there is a little bit of Ruby "glue" in the core reactor. (Not > much.) This should reduce the pressure to integrate "foreign" event > libraries, as well as make it easier to maintain the reactor core separately > from the protocol implementations. > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 9:05 AM, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 8:54 AM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I had been using the rubyforge wiki, though it looks like rubypub is a > > > good idea. Somewhat hard to navigate, but hey :) > > > We should probably make a concensus on something. > > > My question is if the rubypub stuff will migrate wiki comments to the > > > ''next version or if one would have to start over each time... > > > Cheers. > > > -Roger > > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 4:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Devs, > > > > I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in > > > > <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. > > > > To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive and > > > > doc''s again.... > > > > I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some > > > > ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work from > > > > there. > > > > My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? > > > > a) email to the list > > > > b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest > gem)? > > > > c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal RDoc > > > > example to be preferred)? > > > > d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be > offline)? > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Mark > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -Roger Pack > > > For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of > > > love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7 > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > Speaking of which, Francis, are you still interested in setting up Trac > for rubyeventmachine.com ? > > > > Jason > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk >-- -Roger Pack For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7
Rubypub looks a little broken/unmaintained to me. I''m glad to see DistribuStream at the top of the list, but that''s 3 versions behind, and the list hasn''t been updated since last October... On Jan 3, 2008 11:22 AM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005 at gmail.com> wrote:> maybe use rubypub as a drafting board for docs? > Every so often have somebody sync useful ones to the real docs? > > On Jan 3, 2008 7:35 AM, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, very interested in setting up Trac. Let''s discuss offlist. > > > > The source Rdocs are always the first class citizen. I don''t really know > how > > well Rubypub works, in terms of getting timely diffs to project admins. > If > > they actually do a good job, it''s possible that we can officially > "bless" > > that method for making doc changes. But I''d prefer to see how well Trac > > works for us first. > > > > EM is rather an unusual project, as they go. That''s because it''s very > large > > and heterogeneous. (The obvious comparison is to Python''s Twisted, which > has > > also become really large, and also somewhat messy.) On one hand, this is > > good because it means there''s room for much more community participation > and > > contributions than with projects that are more narrowly focused. > > > > On the other hand, it means we''ll need to be very disciplined at setting > > standards for code quality and for code-and-documentation style. I don''t > > want to throw rocks at other projects, so let me just say that we should > > learn from the mistakes that Twisted has made. > > > > I just started working on splitting out the EM event-reactor library > into a > > self-contained unit that can be used from any language. This is largely > true > > today, but there is a little bit of Ruby "glue" in the core reactor. > (Not > > much.) This should reduce the pressure to integrate "foreign" event > > libraries, as well as make it easier to maintain the reactor core > separately > > from the protocol implementations. > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 9:05 AM, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 8:54 AM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I had been using the rubyforge wiki, though it looks like rubypub is > a > > > > good idea. Somewhat hard to navigate, but hey :) > > > > We should probably make a concensus on something. > > > > My question is if the rubypub stuff will migrate wiki comments to > the > > > > ''next version or if one would have to start over each time... > > > > Cheers. > > > > -Roger > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 4:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Devs, > > > > > I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in > > > > > <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. > > > > > To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive > and > > > > > doc''s again.... > > > > > I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some > > > > > ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work > from > > > > > there. > > > > > My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? > > > > > a) email to the list > > > > > b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest > > gem)? > > > > > c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal > RDoc > > > > > example to be preferred)? > > > > > d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be > > offline)? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > Mark > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -Roger Pack > > > > For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of > > > > love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > Speaking of which, Francis, are you still interested in setting up > Trac > > for rubyeventmachine.com ? > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > -- > -Roger Pack > For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of > love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7 > _______________________________________________ > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk >-- Tony Arcieri ClickCaster, Inc. tony at clickcaster.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/eventmachine-talk/attachments/20080103/ccadf1cc/attachment.html
Hi - On Jan 4, 2008 5:38 AM, Tony Arcieri <tony at clickcaster.com> wrote:> Rubypub looks a little broken/unmaintained to me.In case the idea of rubypub has enough appeal to keep it on the radar and maybe consider it later, I just enquired... <quote> Thanks for the email! Rubypub isn''t dead, although I can see how it looks that way. I''ve been busy with some other projects and need to find some time to fix some code that updates the homepage. So "temporarily dormant" would be a good term. </quote> HTH Mark> I''m glad to see DistribuStream at the top of the list, but that''s 3 versions > behind, and the list hasn''t been updated since last October... > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 11:22 AM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005 at gmail.com> wrote: > > maybe use rubypub as a drafting board for docs? > > Every so often have somebody sync useful ones to the real docs? > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 7:35 AM, Francis Cianfrocca < garbagecat10 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Yes, very interested in setting up Trac. Let''s discuss offlist. > > > > > > The source Rdocs are always the first class citizen. I don''t really know > how > > > well Rubypub works, in terms of getting timely diffs to project admins. > If > > > they actually do a good job, it''s possible that we can officially > "bless" > > > that method for making doc changes. But I''d prefer to see how well Trac > > > works for us first. > > > > > > EM is rather an unusual project, as they go. That''s because it''s very > large > > > and heterogeneous. (The obvious comparison is to Python''s Twisted, which > has > > > also become really large, and also somewhat messy.) On one hand, this is > > > good because it means there''s room for much more community participation > and > > > contributions than with projects that are more narrowly focused. > > > > > > On the other hand, it means we''ll need to be very disciplined at setting > > > standards for code quality and for code-and-documentation style. I don''t > > > want to throw rocks at other projects, so let me just say that we should > > > learn from the mistakes that Twisted has made. > > > > > > I just started working on splitting out the EM event-reactor library > into a > > > self-contained unit that can be used from any language. This is largely > true > > > today, but there is a little bit of Ruby "glue" in the core reactor. > (Not > > > much.) This should reduce the pressure to integrate "foreign" event > > > libraries, as well as make it easier to maintain the reactor core > separately > > > from the protocol implementations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 9:05 AM, Jason Roelofs < jameskilton at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 8:54 AM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had been using the rubyforge wiki, though it looks like rubypub is > a > > > > > good idea. Somewhat hard to navigate, but hey :) > > > > > We should probably make a concensus on something. > > > > > My question is if the rubypub stuff will migrate wiki comments to > the > > > > > ''next version or if one would have to start over each time... > > > > > Cheers. > > > > > -Roger > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008 4:12 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Devs, > > > > > > I returned to EM after some time away and writing an irc-logger in > > > > > > <100 l.o.c. reminded me why I enjoyed using it last time. > > > > > > To get back up to speed I found myself digging around the archive > and > > > > > > doc''s again.... > > > > > > I''d like to help, and learn at the same time by constructing some > > > > > > ''usage examples'' - I''ll mostly browse the email archives and work > from > > > > > > there. > > > > > > My question is how would people like to see any such contribution? > > > > > > a) email to the list > > > > > > b) edit www.rubypub.com (but this doesn''t seem to have the latest > > > gem)? > > > > > > c) provide svn patches with the RDoc (is there a ''style''/ideal > RDoc > > > > > > example to be preferred)? > > > > > > d) use the rubyforge wiki (the rubyeventmachine wiki seems to be > > > offline)? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -Roger Pack > > > > > For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of > > > > > love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking of which, Francis, are you still interested in setting up > Trac > > > for rubyeventmachine.com ? > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -Roger Pack > > For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of > > love, and of a sound mind" -- 2 Timothy 1:7 > > _______________________________________________ > > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk > > > > > > -- > Tony Arcieri > ClickCaster, Inc. > tony at clickcaster.com > _______________________________________________ > Eventmachine-talk mailing list > Eventmachine-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/eventmachine-talk >
On Jan 3, 2008 5:23 PM, Mark Van De Vyver <mvyver at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi - > > On Jan 4, 2008 5:38 AM, Tony Arcieri <tony at clickcaster.com> wrote: > > Rubypub looks a little broken/unmaintained to me. > > In case the idea of rubypub has enough appeal to keep it on the radar > and maybe consider it later, I just enquired... > <quote> > Thanks for the email! Rubypub isn''t dead, although I can see how it > looks that way. I''ve been busy with some other projects and need to > find some time to fix some code that updates the homepage. So > "temporarily dormant" would be a good term. > </quote> >Let''s leave off rubypub for the time being, then. For the time being, please submit docs to this list, and it will be up to the project committers to be responsive and either add them or make style suggestions. And please don''t be hesitant to nudge us if we''re slow! And we''ll see about a better solution as soon as we can. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/eventmachine-talk/attachments/20080103/48b6efd2/attachment.html