I haven''t gone through the change log, but in my code, 0.10.0 benchmarks as much as 80%-90% of the speed of 0.9.0. It''s a substantial drop. Kirk Haines
On Dec 16, 2007 7:34 PM, Kirk Haines <wyhaines at gmail.com> wrote:> I haven''t gone through the change log, but in my code, 0.10.0 > benchmarks as much as 80%-90% of the speed of 0.9.0. It''s a > substantial drop. > > >I assume you''re not using the pure-Ruby version of EM? I doubt it because I would have expected a performance degradation more like 50%. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/eventmachine-talk/attachments/20071217/71f558c9/attachment.html
On Dec 17, 2007 9:38 AM, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10 at gmail.com> wrote:> > I assume you''re not using the pure-Ruby version of EM? I doubt it because I > would have expected a performance degradation more like 50%.Right. It''s the C++ version. The performance difference varies a bit depending on which benchmarks I am looking at. In all cases it is slower. In one Analogger benchmark it is only a few percent slower, and only marginally noticable, but in another it is about 10% slower. In the Swiftiply benchmarks it is 10% to 20% slower. I can swap 0.9.0 in and the numbers go right back up. It''s very consistent. Kirk