Adam, I think I could use dtrace -h I just would like to avoid doing so because
of the hoops I believe I will have to go through to get the libtool stuff to
work. I just thought I would ask before going on the adventure of getting the
Makefiles to work.
thanks,
--td
> You could just kludge it up by using the same
> generated names. Is there a
> reason you can''t use dtrace -h?
>
> Adam
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 07:25:53AM -0700, Terry
> Dontje wrote:
> > I think I know the answer to the following but it
> is causing me headaches in changing my makefiles and
> such.
> >
> > Is there a way to access the is-enabled
> functionality without having to generate a header
> file for the probes (that is without doing "dtrace
> -h...")? I assume the answer is no (unless you want
> to hack the dtrace generated names into the code
> which I would imagine is not kindly looked upon).
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > --td
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message posted from opensolaris.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > dtrace-discuss mailing list
> > dtrace-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
> --
> Adam Leventhal, FishWorks
> http://blogs.sun.com/ahl
> ________________________
> dtrace-discuss mailing list
> dtrace-discuss at opensolaris.org
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org