Mike Kuhnkey
2006-Feb-19 16:16 UTC
[dtrace-discuss] Stripped Executable With Not-Stripped Objects--The Flow of Things?
Is there a workable solution for "dtrace -F..." when the main executable is stripped but the load objects are not? If a User process (stripped) has a number of plug-ins (not-stripped), and a number of supporting libraries (not-stripped)...the total being ''load objects''; Is it possible to show User process flow/events or will only the "pid123:::entry and return for the non-stripped objects be visible? Is "pid123::-:entry and return to ''instrument'' the stripped executable the right course? This message posted from opensolaris.org
Adam Leventhal
2006-Feb-19 21:51 UTC
[dtrace-discuss] Stripped Executable With Not-Stripped Objects--The Flow of Things?
Hi Mike, Right now there isn''t a great answer for stripped executables: we can''t discover entry and return probes without symbols and the ''-'' syntax you mentioned is only useful for explicit addresses. As far as tracing stripped binaries, you''re pretty much out of luck so don''t strip! Adam On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:16:57AM -0800, Mike Kuhnkey wrote:> Is there a workable solution for "dtrace -F..." when the main executable is stripped but the load objects are not? > > If a User process (stripped) has a number of plug-ins (not-stripped), and a number of supporting libraries (not-stripped)...the total being ''load objects''; Is it possible to show User process flow/events or will only the "pid123:::entry and return for the non-stripped objects be visible? > > Is "pid123::-:entry and return to ''instrument'' the stripped executable the right course? > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > dtrace-discuss mailing list > dtrace-discuss at opensolaris.org-- Adam Leventhal, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/ahl