dovecot - Jun 2021 - lda to lmtp

so nobody

On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:03 PM Laura Steynes <laura.steynes72 at
gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> Although dovecot-lda serves us fine, we only average 8k messages an hour,
> peaking at 11k, over 4 machines (mostly for redundancy, we've run this
fine
> on just  1 machine, but sometimes clamav makes things get upset, so we
> added some more especially since we are growing rapidly, we decided to see
> if lmtp would be of benefit, so far, we cant tell any difference, I guess
> it is only 120-130 messages a minute, maybe if we were doing 200 a minute
> we might see gain?
>
> The question is with lda we used postfix settings
> destination_recipient_limit=1, we have not added this with lmtp,is this
> needed?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20210611/7d3ed146/attachment.html>

On 2021-06-11 12:42, Laura Steynes wrote:
> so nobody
i am nobody then :)

it would be nice to see postconf -n, and doveconf -n

without this info its hard to help

but remember lda, ltmp is both signle recipient

where come clamav into the mix ?

i dont know much, but its important to provide info to get help
> 
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 12:03 PM Laura Steynes
> <laura.steynes72 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> Although dovecot-lda serves us fine, we only average 8k messages an
>> hour, peaking at 11k, over 4 machines (mostly for redundancy, we've
>> run this fine on just  1 machine, but sometimes clamav makes things
>> get upset, so we added some more especially since we are growing
>> rapidly, we decided to see if lmtp would be of benefit, so far, we
>> cant tell any difference, I guess it is only 120-130 messages a
>> minute, maybe if we were doing 200 a minute we might see gain?
>> 
>> The question is with lda we used postfix settings
>> destination_recipient_limit=1, we have not added this with lmtp,is
>> this needed?