Hi John, ??? I will go on that direction, thank you for the advice. BR Gustavo El 4/11/20 a las 15:33, John Fawcett escribi?:> On 04/11/2020 18:33, Gustavo Ajeitos [Office365] wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> ??? Thank you for your answer! >> >> I agree with you, I think you recommendation should solve the problem, >> it seems the only possible workaround. >> I have to investigate if it possible and how to accomplish that with >> the load balancer. >> >> Gustavo > Gustavo > > client ip address affinity is probably the easiest way - if supported on > your load balancer - and providing that your users are distributed on > different ip addresses (e.g. not behind a NAT and presenting all as the > same ip). > > John >
> On 6. Nov 2020, at 14.12, Gustavo Ajeitos <ajeitos at hornetsecurity.com> wrote: > El 4/11/20 a las 15:33, John Fawcett escribi?: >> On 04/11/2020 18:33, Gustavo Ajeitos [Office365] wrote: >>> Hi John, >>> >>> Thank you for your answer! >>> >>> I agree with you, I think you recommendation should solve the problem, >>> it seems the only possible workaround. >>> I have to investigate if it possible and how to accomplish that with >>> the load balancer. >>> >>> Gustavo >> Gustavo >> >> client ip address affinity is probably the easiest way - if supported on >> your load balancer - and providing that your users are distributed on >> different ip addresses (e.g. not behind a NAT and presenting all as the >> same ip).Best solution is to put dovecot director ring in front of the backends to balance the load. Sami
Hi Sami, ??? Really interesting, I'm new to Dovecot and I didn't know about this feature of the directors, I definitely will look at that. Thank for your hint! BR Gustavo El 6/11/20 a las 09:27, Sami Ketola escribi?:> >> On 6. Nov 2020, at 14.12, Gustavo Ajeitos <ajeitos at hornetsecurity.com> wrote: >> El 4/11/20 a las 15:33, John Fawcett escribi?: >>> On 04/11/2020 18:33, Gustavo Ajeitos [Office365] wrote: >>>> Hi John, >>>> >>>> Thank you for your answer! >>>> >>>> I agree with you, I think you recommendation should solve the problem, >>>> it seems the only possible workaround. >>>> I have to investigate if it possible and how to accomplish that with >>>> the load balancer. >>>> >>>> Gustavo >>> Gustavo >>> >>> client ip address affinity is probably the easiest way - if supported on >>> your load balancer - and providing that your users are distributed on >>> different ip addresses (e.g. not behind a NAT and presenting all as the >>> same ip). > Best solution is to put dovecot director ring in front of the backends to balance the load. > > Sami >