Hi!
Dovecot 2.2.24
Had set up solr and new schema collection. Copied dovecot provided
schema. There was an error with booleans (while getting schema via
http), which I "solved" by removing
"add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema"
from solrconfig.xml. It is correct way to solve this?
Anyway, I run tcpdump to see network activity between dovecot and solr:
#tcpdump -i lo port 8983
and see nothing while doing:
#doveadm fts rescan -u username at domain.tld
no output also from doveadm.
Noticed that dovecot.index.log reapears in user mail root if deleted.
plugin {
fts = solr
fts_solr = url=http://localhost:8983/solr/dovecot/ debug
..
}
--
KSB
On 2016.07.06. 22:51, KSB wrote:> Hi! > Dovecot 2.2.24 > Had set up solr and new schema collection. Copied dovecot provided > schema. There was an error with booleans (while getting schema via > http), which I "solved" by removing "add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" > from solrconfig.xml. It is correct way to solve this? > Anyway, I run tcpdump to see network activity between dovecot and solr: > #tcpdump -i lo port 8983 > and see nothing while doing: > #doveadm fts rescan -u username at domain.tld > no output also from doveadm. > > Noticed that dovecot.index.log reapears in user mail root if deleted. > > plugin { > fts = solr > fts_solr = url=http://localhost:8983/solr/dovecot/ debug > .. > } > > -- > KSBAfter some fiddling around, come in to conclusion that doveadm fts rescan is nothing to do about real indexing. So, it is working. Anyway, now thinking about what really differs when fts is used vs not used. 1 argument is speed, what else? -- KSB
> On Jul 8, 2016, at 5:31 AM, KSB <listeem at ksb.id.lv> wrote: > > 1 argument is speed, what else?Solr is built for indexing, what else do you expect?
On 7/7/2016 2:31 PM, KSB wrote:> On 2016.07.06. 22:51, KSB wrote: >> Hi! >> Dovecot 2.2.24 >> Had set up solr and new schema collection. Copied dovecot provided >> schema. There was an error with booleans (while getting schema via >> http), which I "solved" by removing "add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" >> from solrconfig.xml. It is correct way to solve this? >> Anyway, I run tcpdump to see network activity between dovecot and solr: >> #tcpdump -i lo port 8983 >> and see nothing while doing: >> #doveadm fts rescan -u username at domain.tld >> no output also from doveadm. >> >> Noticed that dovecot.index.log reapears in user mail root if deleted. >> >> plugin { >> fts = solr >> fts_solr = url=http://localhost:8983/solr/dovecot/ debug >> .. >> } >> >> -- >> KSB > > After some fiddling around, come in to conclusion that doveadm fts > rescan is nothing to do about real indexing. So, it is working. > Anyway, now thinking about what really differs when fts is used vs not > used. 1 argument is speed, what else? > > -- > KSB"doveadm fts rescan" resets pointers but does not itself trigger a re-index. But it makes the next actual index scan the full mailbox. The whole point of FTS is "full-text-search". So if you don't use it - you don't need it. But when large mailboxes are involved, searches involving solr indexes are extremely fast compared to non-fts searches. -- Daniel