> On May 30, 2016 at 10:26 PM Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> wrote: > > > Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 21:18:09 CEST): > > Hi Aki, > > > > aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): > > ? > > > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. > > > > Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try > > the xi.dovecot.fi packages. > > The question is, which of these locations is more trustworthy in the > sense of 'production ready'? > > -- > HeikoI'd consider xi.dovecot.fi more reliable myself. AKi
Peter Chiochetti
2016-May-31 08:31 UTC
Ubuntu package - Was: Re: doveadm-server protocol change?
>>> ? >>>> You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. >>> >>> Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try >>> the xi.dovecot.fi packages. >> >> The question is, which of these locations is more trustworthy in the >> sense of 'production ready'? >> >> Heiko > > I'd consider xi.dovecot.fi more reliable myself. > > AKi >Not having installed any of the two, I can say, as a Ubuntu user: In ppa "/etc/init.d/dovecot" is a symlink to "/lib/init/upstart-job" While xi packages places its own init script there. Curiously, dpkg on installation seems not to unlink the existing one first, but overwrite it with the new contents, thereby destroying upstart -- This happened to me last year, I noticed early :) Last checked in 2.2.22 xi package as seen from the contents, did that change? Possible workaround: remove the stock init file link ahead of installation? -- peter
Heiko Schlittermann
2016-May-31 12:32 UTC
Ubuntu package - Was: Re: doveadm-server protocol change?
Hi, Peter Chiochetti <pch at myzel.net> (Di 31 Mai 2016 10:31:50 CEST):> Not having installed any of the two, I can say, as a Ubuntu user: > In ppa "/etc/init.d/dovecot" is a symlink to "/lib/init/upstart-job"The 2.2.24 on 16.04 installs both /etc/init.d/dovecot /lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service> While xi packages places its own init script there.The xi packages I didn't check yet. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Gr??e aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE - ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ - -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20160531/a377edd2/attachment.sig>
Op 30-5-2016 om 22:06 schreef aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi:>> On May 30, 2016 at 10:26 PM Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> wrote: >> >> >> Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 21:18:09 CEST): >>> Hi Aki, >>> >>> aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): >>> ? >>>> You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. >>> Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try >>> the xi.dovecot.fi packages. >> The question is, which of these locations is more trustworthy in the >> sense of 'production ready'? >> >> -- >> Heiko > I'd consider xi.dovecot.fi more reliable myself.The wiki should be pretty clear about this. Using Xi packages for production systems is a very bad idea, unless perhaps you carefully review and test it on another system before every update. If the developers commit a horrible bug to the repositories, you're likely going to be one of the first to notice. Keep that in mind! Regards, Stephan.
Hi Stephan, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> (Mi 01 Jun 2016 13:02:24 CEST): ? Thanks for the hint:> The wiki should be pretty clear about this. Using Xi packages for production > systems is a very bad idea, unless perhaps you carefully review and test it > on another system before every update.I'm using the ppa http://ppa.launchpad.net/patrickdk/production/ubuntu and until now it works fine. Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Gr??e aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE - ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ - -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20160613/e99574e1/attachment.sig>