> On March 6, 2016 at 7:22 PM Andrew McGlashan > <andrew.mcglashan at affinityvision.com.au> wrote: > > > On 6/03/2016 8:16 PM, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > > Stephan, for Jessie you should compile with systemd support enabled and > > leave > > the init.d link out completely. You can enable the ProtectFull=yes in the > > systemd file. > > Many of us Debian users hate the fact that systemd even exists..... for > now we can run servers without systemd, but who knows in a few years or > a couple of releases. > > systemd is a cancer, that's been said before and it will be long time, > if ever, before it is not said regularly. > > Cheers > A.Yet, it would be good idea to enable systemd support for those who use systemd, despite being considered as cancerous by some people, with the same justification that some want to use systemd. Retaining the init.d script does pose some problems, mainly because it seems to interfere with systemctl enable command which gets confused. Aki
aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote:> Yet, it would be good idea to enable systemd support for those who use systemd, > despite being considered as cancerous by some people, with the same > justification that some want to use systemd. Retaining the init.d script does > pose some problems, mainly because it seems to interfere with systemctl enable > command which gets confused.It does? How? If your unit and the init-script are named the same, everything should work as expected. Gr??e, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
I believe we have crossed the realm of off topic. I have no desire to hear about the construction of ubuntu packages. On 03/06/16 11:41, Sven Hartge wrote:> aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > >> Yet, it would be good idea to enable systemd support for those who use systemd, >> despite being considered as cancerous by some people, with the same >> justification that some want to use systemd. Retaining the init.d script does >> pose some problems, mainly because it seems to interfere with systemctl enable >> command which gets confused. > It does? How? > > If your unit and the init-script are named the same, everything should > work as expected. > > Gr??e, > Sven. >