Larry Rosenman
2015-Sep-07 22:01 UTC
Is it a bug when you move mail between namespaces....
should fts_autoindex handle that case? On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:> On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > that the fts data gets lost? > > All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you > copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination folder. > > Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a > GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based on > that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet. >-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
It should.> On 08 Sep 2015, at 01:01, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > should fts_autoindex handle that case? > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi <mailto:tss at iki.fi>> wrote: > On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > that the fts data gets lost? > > All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you > copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination folder. > > Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a > GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based on > that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet. > > > > -- > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler <http://www.lerctr.org/~ler> > Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com <mailto:larryrtx at gmail.com> > US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
Larry Rosenman
2015-Sep-07 22:23 UTC
Is it a bug when you move mail between namespaces....
It doesn't in my current 2.2.18 setup with the config I posted. On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:> It should. > > On 08 Sep 2015, at 01:01, Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> wrote: > > should fts_autoindex handle that case? > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 09/08/2015 12:56 AM, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> > that the fts data gets lost? >> >> All full text search backends are now implemented so that if you >> copy/move mails, the mails need to be indexed again the destination >> folder. >> >> Alternative would be to index mails only with their GUIDs and have a >> GUID => { folder GUID, IMAP UID } mapping and filter the mails based on >> that. But such reverse index doesn't exist quite yet. >> > > > > -- > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler > Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com > US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961 > > >-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Is it a bug when you move mail between namespaces....
- Is it a bug when you move mail between namespaces....
- dovecot-lda can't create /var/mail dotlocks on debian
- dovecot-lda can't create /var/mail dotlocks on debian
- dovecot-lda can't create /var/mail dotlocks on debian