On 04/10/2015 05:10 PM, Hardy Flor wrote:> > Am 06.04.2015 um 09:36 schrieb Hardy Flor: >> Hello, >> >> when I have with "doveadm save ..." store a message, how do I get the >> guid or uid of this message for the setthe flags? >> >> HardyMaybe the feature is just not there? This command has just been added and is not even on the wiki or man page yet. Perhaps in the future doveadm save can provide this as output, but until then, if you have some good known criteria about the message you have just saved, such as Message-Id you can use that in doveadm search, combined with savedsince, this might be reliable enough for your needs.
I had been on 3/12/2015 pointed to the lack of documentation of "doveadm save". It was in the changelog of 2.2.16. Am 10.04.2015 um 23:39 schrieb Gedalya:> On 04/10/2015 05:10 PM, Hardy Flor wrote: >> >> Am 06.04.2015 um 09:36 schrieb Hardy Flor: >>> Hello, >>> >>> when I have with "doveadm save ..." store a message, how do I get the >>> guid or uid of this message for the setthe flags? >>> >>> Hardy > > > Maybe the feature is just not there? This command has just been added > and is not even on the wiki or man page yet. > > Perhaps in the future doveadm save can provide this as output, but > until then, if you have some good known criteria about the message you > have just saved, such as Message-Id you can use that in doveadm > search, combined with savedsince, this might be reliable enough for > your needs.-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Hardy Flor <HFlor at gmx.de> Subject: Re: v2.2.16 released Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:50:40 +0100 Size: 4877 URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20150411/cd089977/attachment-0001.eml>
On 04/11/2015 02:39 AM, Hardy Flor wrote:> I had been on 3/12/2015 pointed to the lack of documentation of "doveadm > save". It was in the changelog of 2.2.16.Unfortunately this is not unique. Dovecot's documentation is at all times significantly lagging behind the code, this is the MO for this project. I guess someone will say "contributions are welcome". There has also been some general discussion about organizing the documentation differently, making it more comprehensive and perhaps verbose, and my own personal impression that every line on the wiki seems to assume you already know everything there is no know about dovecot, except the line you're reading right now ;-) But I must say the documentation is still quite helpful, in its own way. And nothing will change unless people get into a practical discussion about organizing an effort to improve the documentation.