> Namespaces are supported everywhere now.Does this means what we can finally use "deliver" to deliver messages in namespaces?
On 18.11.2007, at 14.10, Nikolay Shopik wrote:>> Namespaces are supported everywhere now. > > Does this means what we can finally use "deliver" to deliver > messages in namespaces?Yes. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071118/fcb62ebb/attachment-0002.bin>
On Sunday 18 November 2007 13:10:32 Nikolay Shopik wrote:> > Namespaces are supported everywhere now. > > Does this means what we can finally use "deliver" to deliver messages in > namespaces?Sorry to sound ignorant, but what /does/ it mean to deliver messages in namespaces? What would be a typical scenario for that? Andreas -- Andreas "daff" Ntaflos Vienna, Austria GPG Fingerprint: 6234 2E8E 5C81 C6CB E5EC 7E65 397C E2A8 090C A9B4 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071118/2e5e1726/attachment-0002.bin>
On 19.11.2007 1:46, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:> On Sunday 18 November 2007 13:10:32 Nikolay Shopik wrote: > >>> Namespaces are supported everywhere now. >>> >> Does this means what we can finally use "deliver" to deliver messages in >> namespaces? >> > > Sorry to sound ignorant, but what /does/ it mean to deliver messages in > namespaces? What would be a typical scenario for that? > > Andreas >Currently you can't deliver messages to public folders, only way is to copy it to this folder using email client or using copy on server.