3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64. I check for updates every day. Jeff -----------------------------------------From: "H" To: "CentOS mailing list" Cc: Sent: Wednesday November 2 2022 6:28:52AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7 On November 1, 2022 5:13:49 PM EDT, Josh Boyer wrote: >On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 5:05 PM H wrote: > >> I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS 7. >This >> is quite an old version and has a serious bug in Calc, possibly an >errant >> pointer, that frequently locks up spreadsheets. >> >> Has anyone installed a later version of LO on CentOS 7? I would >prefer a >> version that is not flatpak, snap or appimage etc... >> > >Could you elaborate why you would like to avoid those packaging >formats? > >josh >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos /> A general dislike of anything that gets between the operating system and an application potentially introducing its own complications. Does anyone happen to know what the latest native version for CentOS 7 is? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos />
--On Wednesday, November 02, 2022 3:53 PM +0000 jefflpost at twc.com wrote:> A general dislike of anything that gets between the operating system > and an application potentially introducing its own complications.Such problems are inevitable when you choose the long-term stability of an old operating system like RHEL. There will always be a tug-of-war between the needs of bleeding-edge apps and the aging OS. Apps want to use features in the latest libraries. So they're either crippled when run on the older OS or they carry more recent copies of those libraries with them, solely for their own use. I'm a fan of sandboxing for security. I've installed web applications (like NodeRED and WordPress) in their own user directories to protect the OS. The trendy solution is containers. I'm worried about how easy it is to back those up. Do I back up the contents, or the whole container file? Ideally I'd just need to incrementally back up the locally-changing part, the configuration and data, since the installer has everything else. The other solution is OS-independent packaging, like those you named. I wasn't familiary with them so I looked them up: <https://phoenixnap.com/kb/flatpak-vs-snap-vs-appimage>
On 11/02/2022 03:53 PM, jefflpost at twc.com wrote:> 3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64. I check for updates every day. > > Jeff > > -----------------------------------------From: "H" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday November 2 2022 6:28:52AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7 > > On November 1, 2022 5:13:49 PM EDT, Josh Boyer wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 5:05 PM H wrote: > > > >> I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS > 7. > >This > >> is quite an old version and has a serious bug in Calc, possibly an > >errant > >> pointer, that frequently locks up spreadsheets. > >> > >> Has anyone installed a later version of LO on CentOS 7? I would > >prefer a > >> version that is not flatpak, snap or appimage etc... > >> > > > >Could you elaborate why you would like to avoid those packaging > >formats? > > > >josh > >_______________________________________________ > >CentOS mailing list > >CentOS at centos.org > >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > /> > A general dislike of anything that gets between the operating system > and an application potentially introducing its own complications. > > Does anyone happen to know what the latest native version for CentOS > 7 is? > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > /> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centosThat seems to be version 3.10.0, or? As I wrote, I am running 5.3.6.1...