CentOS - Jul 2021 - Centos versions in the future?

> On 07/07/2021 13:41, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
>> On 07.07.21 14:31, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote:
>>> Fashion, and Oracle's past practices.? I evaluated
>>> ???? Alma Linux
>>> ???? Fedora
>>> ???? Mint
>>> ???? Open SuSE
>>> ???? Oracle Linux
>>> ???? Springdale Linux
>>> and settled on Alma.? Rocky was still vapourware when Alma was
stable.
>>> I've seen how Oracle promise no change in the long term, then
change
>>> their charging model in the past.? We got badly burned at work when
>>> they took over DEC RDB.
>>>
>>> I like Alma's independence built on Cloud's experience over
many years
>>> building RHEL clones.
>>>
>>
>> Here is another one:
>>
>> https://navylinux.org/
>>
>> --
>> Leon
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> I hadn't seen that one, but I do notice that it aims to be
"minimalist"
> whereas my main machine is the network server (DNS, DHCP etc), a server
> (Wiki, Cloud, storage) and my workstation.
>
> BTW, anyone know who the "Navy Foundation" are?  Is this an arm
of the
> US government?
>
> Martin
See https://navylinux.org/news/legal/

Simon

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:14 AM Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>
wrote:
> > BTW, anyone know who the "Navy Foundation" are?  Is this an
arm of the
> > US government?
> >
> > Martin
>
> See https://navylinux.org/news/legal/

That furthers what I wrote earlier. That says:
 > Date of formation: June 14, 2021

Yet the about page ( https://navylinux.org/about/ ) was changed to
say:
> Navy Linux and The Navy Linux Project is an on-going community project
founded by Navy Foundation on January 4, 2021.

They don't have a straight story, and they've been changing it
inconsistently. That's not how you build trust.