Jamie Burchell
2021-Jan-05 23:31 UTC
[CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver
Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple way and just perpetually updates Windows 10 now. On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:20, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:> On 1/5/21 3:02 PM, Jamie Burchell wrote: > > We will need to (manually) migrate to Stream 9.x after 5 years instead of > > 10 though? > > > Yes. CentOS Stream has a lifecycle comparable with other LTS > distributions. > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >
Scott Robbins
2021-Jan-06 02:01 UTC
[CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +0000, Jamie Burchell wrote:> Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of > destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple > way and just perpetually updates Windows 10 now.I'm not sure how it will go. Fedora now has a very good upgrade tool that has worked for me through a few versions. So, hopefully, RH, and CentOS will have one too, who knows, maybe in time to migrate to Stream-9. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
Mauricio Tavares
2021-Jan-06 13:16 UTC
[CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 6:32 PM Jamie Burchell <mail at jamieburchell.com> wrote:> > Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of > destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple > way and just perpetually updates Windows 10 now. >Do you use tools like ansible/chef? If you can put the time in, you can make your webservers rather distro agnostic. I would even put terraform on the table. It is not like your customers will know the difference.> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:20, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 1/5/21 3:02 PM, Jamie Burchell wrote: > > > We will need to (manually) migrate to Stream 9.x after 5 years instead of > > > 10 though? > > > > > > Yes. CentOS Stream has a lifecycle comparable with other LTS > > distributions. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Matthew Miller
2021-Jan-06 16:32 UTC
[CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +0000, Jamie Burchell wrote:> Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of > destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple > way and just perpetually updates Windows 10 now.Red Hat is working on this with a tool called "Leapp" for RHEL 7 to 8 upgrades. I have no idea if this or something similar is going to be available for the Stream 8 to 9 transition, but it'd definitely be useful and I think in everyone's interest (because Red Hat wants as many Stream users as possible on the latest release). https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/upgrading-rhel-7-rhel-8-leapp-and-boom -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader