Strahil:
I WAS using that, but the automatic umount never worked, leaving it mounted
all the time.
I commented out those entries in /etc/auto.master before modifying the
fstab entry:
UUID=259ec5ea-e8a4-465a-9263-1c06217b9aaf /mnt/backup
ext4,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.idle-timeout=15min noauto 0 2
which is exactly as it was before except for the x-systemd entries as you
described.
and the peculiar thing is it STILL does not automount. and yes, I did do
systemctl restart local-fs.target.
do I need to reboot (or something simpler, maybe) to fully disable the
auto.master stuff?
Thanks again!
Fred
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 5:54 AM Strahil Nikolov via CentOS <centos at
centos.org>
wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> do you use automatic umount for the map in /etc/auto.master (--timeout) ?
>
> If yes, then the systemd mount options probably won't help.
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ? ??????, 3 ?????? 2021 ?., 04:27:17 ???????+2, Fred <
> fred.fredex at gmail.com> ??????:
>
>
>
>
>
> Yeah, and the instructions for setting RAID-1 or RAID-0 have the switch
> positions exactly reversed.
>
> Strahil: I'm using autofs to automount the unit. but just turned that
off
> and enabled the xsystemd.automount in fstab, we'll see how that works.
>
> Fred
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 4:11 PM Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com>
wrote:
>
> > On Jan 2, 2021, at 11:17 AM, Fred <fred.fredex at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > I assume that the yottamaster device runs Linux, just like 99% of
other
> > > such devices.
> >
> > 99% of NAS boxes, maybe, but not dumb RAID boxes like the one I
believe
> > you?re referring to.
> >
> > (And I doubt even that, with the likes of FreeNAS extending down from
the
> > enterprise space where consumer volume can affect that sort of thing.)
> >
> > I have more than speculation to back that guess: the available
firmware
> > images are far too small to contain a Linux OS image, their manuals
don?t
> > talk about Linux or GPL that I can see, and there?s no place to
download
> > their Linux source code per the GPL.
> >
> > While doing this exploration, I?ve run into multiple problems with
their
> > web site, which strengthens my suspicion that this box is your
culprit.
> If
> > they?re this slipshod with their marketing material, what does that
say
> > about their engineering department?
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>