We're delighted to announce the schedule, and registration, for the upcoming CentOS Dojo in Brussels, on February 1, 2019, the day before FOSDEM starts. Details are here: https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2019 The schedule is still marked "Tentative" since I have not received confirmation from all of the speakers yet, but we're almost there. Registration is FREE, but we do ask that you register anyways, since it helps us with venue planning and catering. See you in Brussels! -- Rich Bowen - rbowen at redhat.com http://centos.org/ - @CentOSProject 859 351 9166
Hi. New to this list.? If this has been answered/resolved already, please point me to the solution. In a very recent update to CentOS 7 libstdc++ has been altered in a way that has removed CXXABI_1.3.8 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20.? I've noticed that this has broken a number of executables linked on other systems that used to run on CentOS 7.? Is there any fix for this short of backing off the update? Ubuntu seems to still allow these broken images to run.? But I want the solid reliability CentOS has.? If somebody can give me examples of Ubuntu up and running actual programs for a year plus then I'll gladly switch.? I've never heard of Ubuntu dong that.? I have had CentOS do that for me. Thank you. -- Chris Johnson rchristopherjohnson at gmail.com Ex SysAdmin, now, writer /War does not determine who is right ? only who is left./ (Bertand Russell)
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:10:22PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:> In a very recent update to CentOS 7 libstdc++ has been altered in a way that > has removed CXXABI_1.3.8 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20.? I've noticed that this has > broken a number of executables linked on other systems that used to run on > CentOS 7.? Is there any fix for this short of backing off the update?I don't see any evidence that the libstdc++ in CentOS 7 ever had version definitions for CXXABI_1.3.8 or GLIBCXX_3.4.20. Both seem to only go up to CXXABI_1.3.7 and GLIBCXX_3.4.19, at least with the libstdc++ package. Perhaps you built your binaries on a system with newer version definitions? -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>