On 01/27/2016 04:59 PM, Clint Dilks wrote:> What is the result of> ldd /usr/lib64/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin # ldd /usr/lib64/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffe525fc000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003d6b400000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003d6bc00000) librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003d6c000000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003d71c00000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003d6b800000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003d71800000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003d6b000000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003d6ac00000) -- Tim Evans | 5 Chestnut Court UNIX System Admin Consulting | Owings Mills, MD 21117 http://www.tkevans.com/ | 443-394-3864 tkevans at tkevans.com
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans <tkevans at tkevans.com> wrote:> On 01/27/2016 04:59 PM, Clint Dilks wrote: > > What is the result of >> > > ldd /usr/lib64/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin > > # ldd /usr/lib64/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffe525fc000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003d6b400000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003d6bc00000) > librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003d6c000000) > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003d71c00000) > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003d6b800000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003d71800000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003d6b000000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003d6ac00000) >This looks like all dependencies are met but I noticed something, your first message mentions /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin, we are looking at /usr/lib64/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin, which one are you using and do both exist on your system ?
On 01/27/2016 05:11 PM, Clint Dilks wrote:> This looks like all dependencies are met but I noticed something, your > first message mentions /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin, we are looking > at /usr/lib64/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin, which one are you using and do both > exist on your system ?My bad for fogging things up. Besides the epel rpm, I had also tried the (non-rpm) tar file from mozilla of the latest beta release (installed in /usr/local). That turns out to be a 32-bit version. The epel rpm is clearly 64-bit. -- Tim Evans |5 Chestnut Court 443-394-3864 |Owings Mills, MD 21117