On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote:> On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: >> On 08/27/15 09:31, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> <> >> >>> *sigh* >>> And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, >>> 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way.... >>> >> . >> i seriously doubt it. >> >> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. > > Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, > they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems. >. as i wrote; several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos to respond to request that i made. and i made them to see if who i was writing to was in fact live and real. Julie Anna showed a very goodly attitude and even a bit of maturity about her. very much unlike yours. ;-)> Most spam seems to come from a small group of spammers that operate out > of South Florida, why there I don't know. >. i would not call her a spammer in the full sense of the meaning of spamming. i say this because if i had not responded, i seriously doubt that i would have received any more emails. we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to maintain. in fact, i found it to be an enjoyable time, until you started your griping about it. as for some of the pix that she sent, yes, she bared her breast, but so what, i have seen bare breast from my childhood years and i do still admire and enjoy seeing them. in fact, the city where i live had a 'topless fest' at the local city park. it was a most enjoyable event. all had a good time, no one got raped, molested, or arrested. at least i was not aware that there were of or see any. i did see many beautiful women with beautiful breast and they had every right to be proud of them. to shun and condemn children knowledge of human anatomy and not give them a proper education of anatomy and sex is tending to point them into a life of perversion, molestation and homosexuality. when my daughter was was old enough to understand, comprehend, and reason, i started explaining life, anatomy, sexual differences, and why men and women are different. i started with basics and as she grew older and could understand more, i explained more to her. the results of all of it were well worth it because she grew up to be a well adjusted normal woman. why did i do it? simple. it was written in several of the child psychology books that i have read. basically, teach them young and not have to worry about them when they are older. this is getting very "off topic". if you would like to continue this with opinions of others, join the mozilla general news. that is unless you are afraid to because i am sure that there many subscribers of the group that will agree with me. -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g .
On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:> > > On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: >>> On 08/27/15 09:31, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> <> >>> >>>> *sigh* >>>> And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, >>>> 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way.... >>>> >>> . >>> i seriously doubt it. >>> >>> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. >> >> Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, >> they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems. >> > . > as i wrote; > > several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. > > the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos > to respond to request that i made.Okay, um, I have done some work related to that industry - never for a company that spams. For about $10 you can buy photosets, usually of Eastern European models, with hundreds of photos in different settings. So no, the photos are most certainly not an indication of who you were communicating with. But enough off-topic. Those kind of e-mails should only be sent to people who specifically opt-in to receive them. That's the bottom line.
On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:> we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of > a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to > maintain.PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek. nayways, none of this has ANYthing to do with CENTOS and really, is totally off topic for this list. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
On 08/27/15 13:00, Alice Wonder wrote:> > > On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: >>>> On 08/27/15 09:31, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> <> >>>> >>>>> *sigh* >>>>> And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, >>>>> 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way.... >>>>> >>>> . >>>> i seriously doubt it. >>>> >>>> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. >>> >>> Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, >>> they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems. >>> >> . >> as i wrote; >> >> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. >> >> the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos >> to respond to request that i made. >> Okay, um, I have done some work related to that industry - never for a > company that spams. >. i will be polite and not ask what company. :-)> For about $10 you can buy photosets, usually of Eastern European models, > with hundreds of photos in different settings. >. yes, i have seen them. but i believe, why should i pay for what i can see for free and live.> So no, the photos are most certainly not an indication of who you were > communicating with. >. very true.> But enough off-topic. Those kind of e-mails should only be sent to > people who specifically opt-in to receive them. That's the bottom line. >. i agree. one should always have choice of what pleasure one receives, or gives. tho the mystery of yet to come can make pleasures greater. also, i do like to see the change in your attitude. a good indication of maturity. i still believe moz gen would be a good place to continue because of the additional input. -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g .
On 08/27/15 13:07, John R Pierce wrote:> On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: >> we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of >> a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to >> maintain. > > PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek. >. that is one place for a tongue. ;-) look at the meaning of the word. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intercourse it does not only mean coitus.> nayways, none of this has ANYthing to do with CENTOS and really, is > totally off topic for this list. >. true. and i thank moderate for his understanding. i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you? -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g .
AND With that all said, I am UNSUBSCRIBING FROM THIS LIST! I came to this list hoping to LEARN and get HELP with CentOS, but instead, I am getting plagued with this damn garbage. 30+ emails daily in the last week or so is way too much. Maybe I can find more INTELLIGENT conversation in the forums. On 8/27/2015 2:00 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:> > > On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote: >>>> On 08/27/15 09:31, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> <> >>>> >>>>> *sigh* >>>>> And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, >>>>> 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way.... >>>>> >>>> . >>>> i seriously doubt it. >>>> >>>> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. >>> >>> Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, >>> they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems. >>> >> . >> as i wrote; >> >> several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy. >> >> the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos >> to respond to request that i made. > > Okay, um, I have done some work related to that industry - never for a > company that spams. > > For about $10 you can buy photosets, usually of Eastern European > models, with hundreds of photos in different settings. > > So no, the photos are most certainly not an indication of who you were > communicating with. > > But enough off-topic. Those kind of e-mails should only be sent to > people who specifically opt-in to receive them. That's the bottom line. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >-- Marc Chubbuck Sr. American Legion Sr. Vice Commander Gales Ferry - Ledyard Post 205 (860) 440-6420