On 08/07/2015 01:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:> 6.7 is there most places ... since we have more than 500 external > mirrors (right now 593) not all of them are updated. (looks like > 4% still are not completely updated)what about the src.rpms? it seems http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/ and http://vault.centos.org/6.7/cr/Source/ is empty and while http://vault.centos.org/6.7/updates/Source/SPackages/ also seems to very outdated. thanks in advance. regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
On 08/07/2015 01:56 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:> On 08/07/2015 01:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> 6.7 is there most places ... since we have more than 500 external >> mirrors (right now 593) not all of them are updated. (looks like >> 4% still are not completely updated) > > what about the src.rpms? it seems http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/ and > http://vault.centos.org/6.7/cr/Source/ is empty and while > http://vault.centos.org/6.7/updates/Source/SPackages/ also seems to > very outdated.I think it would make more sense to wait for the actual release announcement first before asking about missing files. Regards, Denis
On 08/07/2015 06:56 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:> On 08/07/2015 01:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> 6.7 is there most places ... since we have more than 500 external >> mirrors (right now 593) not all of them are updated. (looks like >> 4% still are not completely updated) > > what about the src.rpms? it seems http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/ and > http://vault.centos.org/6.7/cr/Source/ is empty and while > http://vault.centos.org/6.7/updates/Source/SPackages/ also seems to > very outdated.6.7/updates SRPMs are not outdated .. they are new updates for 6.7 6.7/cr does not get populated until 6.8 is released, of course it is empty now, if you look here: http://vault.centos.org/6.6/cr/Source/SPackages/ (where the 6.7 rpms for CR were released {into 6.6} ... SCORE) That is only for NEW packages built ... not things carried over from older trees. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150807/f1e0f25d/attachment-0001.sig>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/08/15 13:56, Farkas Levente wrote:> On 08/07/2015 01:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> 6.7 is there most places ... since we have more than 500 external >> mirrors (right now 593) not all of them are updated. (looks >> like 4% still are not completely updated) > > what about the src.rpms? it seems http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/ > and http://vault.centos.org/6.7/cr/Source/ is empty and while > http://vault.centos.org/6.7/updates/Source/SPackages/ also seems > to very outdated. > > thanks in advance. regards. >Well, As releasing the main distro is using quite some bandwidth (during release, the aggregated bandwidth for our msync nodes is ~4Gbits/s, during several hours), we wait for the msync network to go back to normal mode, before pushing the SRPMS to Vault. 6.6 has already been copied to vault, so will disappear from mirror.centos.org soon. SRPMS will be synced to vault soon too, probably later today. Cheers, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlXEovkACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5BegCePPC95riIUOM3NxVm/38amlqj qEQAni0kztYtGu61wG+mX909jppmXoZq =V8TG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 08/07/2015 02:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:> On 08/07/2015 06:56 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> On 08/07/2015 01:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> 6.7 is there most places ... since we have more than 500 external >>> mirrors (right now 593) not all of them are updated. (looks like >>> 4% still are not completely updated) >> >> what about the src.rpms? it seems http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/ and >> http://vault.centos.org/6.7/cr/Source/ is empty and while >> http://vault.centos.org/6.7/updates/Source/SPackages/ also seems to >> very outdated. > > 6.7/updates SRPMs are not outdated .. they are new updates for 6.7eg: there is a 6.7/updates/x86_64/Packages/firefox-38.1.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm for which there is no src.rpm in http://vault.centos.org/6.7/updates/Source/SPackages/ so that's what i mean is outdated. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"