Il 14/05/2015 13:40, Tris Hoar ha scritto:> On 14/05/2015 10:16, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Hi List, >> I've installed C7.1 and today configuring fstab for another disk I get >> this: >> >> UUID=d5ff30df-9e1d-4fc8-99b6-845ffa6509db / xfs >> defaults 0 0 >> UUID=052f75bc-0513-45e0-a01f-06c9a698469f /mnt/data xfs >> defaults 0 0 >> UUID=732dafbd-2f14-4dd6-8513-1504b13302f1 swap swap >> defaults 0 0 >> >> >> Fields fs_freq and fs_passno are all set to 0. This fstab was generated >> by the installer and not yet modified. >> >> To reproduce this, I've installed a minimal centos on a VM and the same >> problem persists. >> >> I don't know if this is a bug or if there is a new system that does not >> require the last two field on C7 REL 1503. >> >> Someone has the same problem? >> >> THanks in advance. >> >> > > This is the default when using the xfs filesystem > > Tris >Hi Tris, sorry but, I've another c7(1406) and the upgraded to 1503 rel with all xfs fs but in fstab i get different values. Why this is the default for xfs? No fsck on boot? (Sorry I can't find info on web) What's happening if I set 1 1, 1 2...? Thanks in advance.
On 14 May 2015 16:12, "Alessandro Baggi" <alessandro.baggi at gmail.com> wrote:> > Il 14/05/2015 13:40, Tris Hoar ha scritto: >> >> On 14/05/2015 10:16, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> >>> Hi List, >>> I've installed C7.1 and today configuring fstab for another disk I get >>> this: >>> >>> UUID=d5ff30df-9e1d-4fc8-99b6-845ffa6509db / xfs >>> defaults 0 0 >>> UUID=052f75bc-0513-45e0-a01f-06c9a698469f /mnt/data xfs >>> defaults 0 0 >>> UUID=732dafbd-2f14-4dd6-8513-1504b13302f1 swap swap >>> defaults 0 0 >>> >>> >>> Fields fs_freq and fs_passno are all set to 0. This fstab was generated >>> by the installer and not yet modified. >>> >>> To reproduce this, I've installed a minimal centos on a VM and the same >>> problem persists. >>> >>> I don't know if this is a bug or if there is a new system that does not >>> require the last two field on C7 REL 1503. >>> >>> Someone has the same problem? >>> >>> THanks in advance. >>> >>> >> >> This is the default when using the xfs filesystem >> >> Tris >> > > > Hi Tris, > sorry but, I've another c7(1406) and the upgraded to 1503 rel with allxfs fs but in fstab i get different values.> > Why this is the default for xfs? No fsck on boot? (Sorry I can't findinfo on web)> > What's happening if I set 1 1, 1 2...? > > Thanks in advance.There is no boot time XFS fsck The fsck.xfs file is a noop In the event that a repair is needed you should use xfs_repair ... The design is to avoid this though and if you reach this stage bad things must have happened to your system (more than a simple power loss probably).
Il 14/05/2015 19:46, James Hogarth ha scritto:> On 14 May 2015 16:12, "Alessandro Baggi" <alessandro.baggi at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Il 14/05/2015 13:40, Tris Hoar ha scritto: >>> >>> On 14/05/2015 10:16, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi List, >>>> I've installed C7.1 and today configuring fstab for another disk I get >>>> this: >>>> >>>> UUID=d5ff30df-9e1d-4fc8-99b6-845ffa6509db / xfs >>>> defaults 0 0 >>>> UUID=052f75bc-0513-45e0-a01f-06c9a698469f /mnt/data xfs >>>> defaults 0 0 >>>> UUID=732dafbd-2f14-4dd6-8513-1504b13302f1 swap swap >>>> defaults 0 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> Fields fs_freq and fs_passno are all set to 0. This fstab was generated >>>> by the installer and not yet modified. >>>> >>>> To reproduce this, I've installed a minimal centos on a VM and the same >>>> problem persists. >>>> >>>> I don't know if this is a bug or if there is a new system that does not >>>> require the last two field on C7 REL 1503. >>>> >>>> Someone has the same problem? >>>> >>>> THanks in advance. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> This is the default when using the xfs filesystem >>> >>> Tris >>> >> >> >> Hi Tris, >> sorry but, I've another c7(1406) and the upgraded to 1503 rel with all > xfs fs but in fstab i get different values. >> >> Why this is the default for xfs? No fsck on boot? (Sorry I can't find > info on web) >> >> What's happening if I set 1 1, 1 2...? >> >> Thanks in advance. > > There is no boot time XFS fsck > > The fsck.xfs file is a noop > > In the event that a repair is needed you should use xfs_repair ... The > design is to avoid this though and if you reach this stage bad things must > have happened to your system (more than a simple power loss probably). > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >Thanks for your reply. Than there is not automatic check for xfs fs from boot without user script.