El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?:> On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have >> all IPv6s available for usage. > > Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats > 1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,000 individual IPs ? > > Or, its 65536 /64 subnets of 18,446,744,073,709,552,000 hosts each. > > >Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my work...).
On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:> Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my work...).It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's almost certainly not possible to use all of the addresses in such a space, but that's the point. IPv6 is intended to eliminate address scarcity.
On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote:> El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?: >> On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >>> We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have >>> all IPv6s available for usage. >> >> Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats >> 1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,000 individual IPs ? >> >> Or, its 65536 /64 subnets of 18,446,744,073,709,552,000 hosts each. >> >> >> > Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my > work...).so what is it you want to do with these 1.2 septillion IP addresses? you certainly can't assign them all to one system, there's not that many file handles, nor can one system have anywheres remotely close to that many vhosts. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
On 1/10/2015 8:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:> On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my >> work...). > > It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's > almost certainly not possible to use all of the addresses in such a > space, but that's the point. IPv6 is intended to eliminate address > scarcity.yes, but whats crazy is the OP's original request, he apparently thinks he wants a lan alias on every single IP....> It happens that at the company I'm working decided to start migration > of IPs tech. > > So they got a /48 block. I were trying to add it with: > > ifcfg-eth0-range1 (0 is already in use with IPv4 range): > > IPV6ADDR_START=xxxx > IPV6ADDR_END=xxxx > CLONENUM_START=0 > > But of course I am assuming that like in IPv4 IPADDR_START/END is > implemented. > > Please give some guidance as I need this to done already and the hole > /48 must be available and virtualized.-- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
El 10/01/2015 a las 11:41 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?:> On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?: >>> On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >>>> We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have >>>> all IPv6s available for usage. >>> >>> Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats >>> 1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,000 individual IPs ? >>> >>> Or, its 65536 /64 subnets of 18,446,744,073,709,552,000 hosts each. >>> >>> >>> >> Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my >> work...). > > so what is it you want to do with these 1.2 septillion IP addresses? > you certainly can't assign them all to one system, there's not that > many file handles, nor can one system have anywheres remotely close to > that many vhosts. > > >Yup. It is actually just a way to figure out how to handle this with easy. But this will be use for a wide spread implementation.