Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time. The CentOS team sucks ... it took XXXX days to do 6.1 ... it is going to take twice as long to get 6.2 My mom said CentOS blows. kbsingh is ugly. hughesjr is old and fat. OK ... that should do. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111209/10103a24/attachment.sig>
On 12/09/2011 08:01 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time. > > The CentOS team sucks ... it took XXXX days to do 6.1 ... it is going to > take twice as long to get 6.2 > > My mom said CentOS blows. > > kbsingh is ugly. > > hughesjr is old and fat. > > OK ... that should do.I think this was an attempt at humour, but it didn't work very well. :) -- Digimer E-Mail: digimer at alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org "omg my singularity battery is dead again. stupid hawking radiation." - epitron
At 2011-12-09 Fri 19:01 -0600?Johnny Hughes wroted?> it took XXXX days to do 6.1 ... it is going to > take twice as long to get 6.2I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: ??????????? URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111210/bffabd91/attachment.sig>
On 10 December 2011 01:01, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote:> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time. > > The CentOS team sucks ... it took XXXX days to do 6.1 ... it is going to > take twice as long to get 6.2 > > My mom said CentOS blows. > > kbsingh is ugly. > > hughesjr is old and fat. > > OK ... that should do.<3
On 10/12/11 03:36, An Yang wrote:> I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.Unless it was parked on a hill backwards and now rolling down the hill! Congratulations to the CentOS team again!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Johnny,> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time. > > The CentOS team sucks ... it took XXXX days to do 6.1 ... it is going to > take twice as long to get 6.2 > > My mom said CentOS blows. > > kbsingh is ugly. > > hughesjr is old and fat. > > OK ... that should do.OK, thanks. A simple '6.1 has been released' would have done, though :-) Cheers, Peter. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk7jRMgACgkQ+8TW1Xhd1gdQpgCgr/V8vNb9TJIgI6ScwZsrScUn AA8An0YGvp0csjKj8NDxiMDy0ogb4/dZ =tApB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:01 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time. > > The CentOS team sucks ... it took XXXX days to do 6.1 ... it is going to > take twice as long to get 6.2 > > My mom said CentOS blows. > > kbsingh is ugly. > > hughesjr is old and fat. > > OK ... that should do.come on Johnny, there are still plenty of people that appreciate the work you guys do and are happy to see 6.1 released. Please give us first a chance to say "thank you so much!" I understand that it is frustrating to release CentOS 6.1 right after RedHat release 6.2 so you can't even allow yourself to relax a bit (and knowing you guys you HAVE to keep up, not because of the complainer, but because of your pride in what you are doing and its results). Thanks for the work on 6.1! Louis
A big thank you to the CentOS team for the 6.1 release. And nice to see that there will be a CR repo again. See you all at FOSDEM2012. Maarten
On 10/12/11 01:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time. > > The CentOS team sucks ... it took XXXX days to do 6.1 ... it is going to > take twice as long to get 6.2 > > My mom said CentOS blows. > > kbsingh is ugly. > > hughesjr is old and fat. > > OK ... that should do. > > > > This body part will be downloaded on demand.Haha :-). Made me laugh. In all seriousness though, I would just like to say: Thank you CentOS team for the work you put in, I'm updating my Grandma's PC to 6.1 now (from 6.0 CR enabled) :-), So again: Thank You :-). -- Jake
Vreme: 12/10/2011 02:01 AM, Johnny Hughes pi?e:> Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time. > > The CentOS team sucks ... it took XXXX days to do 6.1 ... it is going to > take twice as long to get 6.2 > > My mom said CentOS blows. > > kbsingh is ugly. > > hughesjr is old and fat. > > OK ... that should do. >It made me laugh too. Although it does ring a bell. My suggestion would be to, at least for the first part, count the number of packages and once a week or two release percentage of built packages. that would give the "feel of progress" to all concerned. And since most likely the large number of packages will build in first several build attempts, progress would be visible to anyone. And I do know complicated packages are lest for last and prognoses can not be made for those. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant