Jonathan Vomacka
2011-Nov-13 23:28 UTC
[CentOS] binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface
I know this was discussed before, and I have seen a million ways of doing this via online docs. I have a quick question that hopefully the community can help me out with I am trying to add a block of 10 IP addresses. Rather then create 10 different alias files, I want to use the RANGE file. Docs say to use the following format: IPADDR_START=x.x.x.x IPADDR_END=x.x.x.x CLONENUM_START=0 If the IP's that are given to you are on a completely seperate gateway / netmask, how would you enter it into this file? Is it necessary? Please advise.
Reindl Harald
2011-Nov-13 23:35 UTC
[CentOS] binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface
Am 14.11.2011 00:28, schrieb Jonathan Vomacka:> I know this was discussed before, and I have seen a million ways of > doing this via online docs. I have a quick question that hopefully the > community can help me out with > > I am trying to add a block of 10 IP addresses. Rather then create 10 > different alias files, I want to use the RANGE file. > > Docs say to use the following format: > IPADDR_START=x.x.x.x > IPADDR_END=x.x.x.x > CLONENUM_START=0 > > If the IP's that are given to you are on a completely seperate gateway / > netmask, how would you enter it into this file? Is it necessary? Please > advise.who needs ranges? configure what you need! cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 IPADDR=10.0.0.6 GATEWAY=10.0.0.1 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 ONBOOT=yes BOOTPROTO=static TYPE=Ethernet MODE=Managed IPV6INIT=no NM_CONTROLLED=no USERCTL=no MTU=1500 cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:1 DEVICE=eth0:1 IPADDR=10.0.0.7 ONPARENT=yes cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:2 DEVICE=eth0:2 IPADDR=10.0.0.5 ONPARENT=yes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111114/a92af049/attachment.sig>
Jonathan Vomacka
2011-Nov-13 23:42 UTC
[CentOS] binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface
Reindl, A block of 10 IPV4 is not a lot, and they will all eventually be used. My question is, my server IP is 66.80.x.x and my additional IPS are in the 50.7.x.x range using a netmask of 255.255.255.248. Can the netmask be written in the range file like it is in the ifcfg-eth0:0? On 11/13/2011 6:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:> Am 14.11.2011 00:28, schrieb Jonathan Vomacka: >> I know this was discussed before, and I have seen a million ways of >> doing this via online docs. I have a quick question that hopefully the >> community can help me out with >> >> I am trying to add a block of 10 IP addresses. Rather then create 10 >> different alias files, I want to use the RANGE file. >> >> Docs say to use the following format: >> IPADDR_START=x.x.x.x >> IPADDR_END=x.x.x.x >> CLONENUM_START=0 >> >> If the IP's that are given to you are on a completely seperate gateway / >> netmask, how would you enter it into this file? Is it necessary? Please >> advise. > > who needs ranges? > configure what you need! > > cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 > DEVICE=eth0 > IPADDR=10.0.0.6 > GATEWAY=10.0.0.1 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > ONBOOT=yes > BOOTPROTO=static > TYPE=Ethernet > MODE=Managed > IPV6INIT=no > NM_CONTROLLED=no > USERCTL=no > MTU=1500 > > cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:1 > DEVICE=eth0:1 > IPADDR=10.0.0.7 > ONPARENT=yes > > cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:2 > DEVICE=eth0:2 > IPADDR=10.0.0.5 > ONPARENT=yes > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
John R Pierce
2011-Nov-13 23:42 UTC
[CentOS] binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface
On 11/13/11 3:28 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:> If the IP's that are given to you are on a completely seperate gateway / > netmask, how would you enter it into this file? Is it necessary? Please > advise.on a completely separate gateway/mask from what? -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast