CentOS - Nov 2010 - Rebuilding samba3x rpms results in size doubled

Hi,

I have rebuilt samba3x SRPM in Centos 5.5. The resultings RPM's are nearly
in triple size of the original RPMs. I have installed and checked the binary
files are stripped. What can result in such difference in RPM sizes?

I have not changed anything on built and install sections of spec file.

Regards,



Some files and sizes in original samba3x rpm:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17904 Mar 31  2010 recycle.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18156 Mar 31  2010 shadow_copy2.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  9668 Mar 31  2010 shadow_copy.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13844 Mar 31  2010 smb_traffic_analyzer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13796 Mar 31  2010 streams_depot.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17984 Mar 31  2010 streams_xattr.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  5560 Mar 31  2010 syncops.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17744 Mar 31  2010 xattr_tdb.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22052 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/acl_tdb.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17920 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/acl_xattr.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9668 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 14060 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/cap.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5448 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/default_quota.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5512 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/dirsort.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9600 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/expand_msdfs.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13832 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/extd_audit.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5444 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/fake_perms.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9644 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/fileid.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 31312 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/full_audit.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9696 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/netatalk.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9636 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/preopen.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9584 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/readahead.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17752 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/readonly.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17904 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/recycle.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9668 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/shadow_copy.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18156 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/shadow_copy2.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13844 Mar 31  2010
/usr/lib/samba/vfs/smb_traffic_analyzer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13796 Mar 31  2010
/usr/lib/samba/vfs/streams_depot.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17984 Mar 31  2010
/usr/lib/samba/vfs/streams_xattr.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5560 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/syncops.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17744 Mar 31  2010 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/xattr_tdb.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2502552 Mar 31  2010 /usr/sbin/nmbd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6807276 Mar 31  2010 /usr/sbin/smbd



Some files and sizes in mine samba3x rpm:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 62018 Nov 26 14:50 recycle.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 72876 Nov 26 14:50 shadow_copy2.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 44528 Nov 26 14:50 shadow_copy.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 54391 Nov 26 14:50 smb_traffic_analyzer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 56096 Nov 26 14:50 streams_depot.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 63394 Nov 26 14:50 streams_xattr.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42007 Nov 26 14:50 syncops.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 63989 Nov 26 14:50 xattr_tdb.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 68818 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/acl_tdb.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 60184 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/acl_xattr.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 46167 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 60597 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/cap.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 37894 Nov 26 14:50
/usr/lib/samba/vfs/default_quota.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 40378 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/dirsort.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 44448 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/expand_msdfs.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 51756 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/extd_audit.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 37428 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/fake_perms.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 46429 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/fileid.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 95070 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/full_audit.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 48276 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/netatalk.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 48882 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/preopen.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 43154 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/readahead.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 62346 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/readonly.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 62018 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/recycle.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 44528 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/shadow_copy.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 72876 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/shadow_copy2.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 54391 Nov 26 14:50
/usr/lib/samba/vfs/smb_traffic_analyzer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 56096 Nov 26 14:50
/usr/lib/samba/vfs/streams_depot.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 63394 Nov 26 14:50
/usr/lib/samba/vfs/streams_xattr.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 42007 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/syncops.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 63989 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/lib/samba/vfs/xattr_tdb.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6293564 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/sbin/nmbd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 18057363 Nov 26 14:50 /usr/sbin/smbd



--
Oguz YILMAZ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20101128/7f5043c5/attachment-0001.html>

On Monday, November 29, 2010 04:15 AM, Oguz Yilmaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have rebuilt samba3x SRPM in Centos 5.5. The resultings RPM's are
> nearly in triple size of the original RPMs. I have installed and checked
> the binary files are stripped. What can result in such difference in RPM
> sizes?
Maybe if you supply the changes you made to configure and someone might 
want to take a guess/look. Unless you think we are all psychic or have 
crystal balls that work or something.

> I have rebuilt samba3x SRPM in Centos 5.5. The resultings RPM's are 
> nearly in triple size of the original RPMs. I have installed and 
> checked the binary files are stripped. What can result in such 
> difference in RPM sizes?
Debugging information not removed from binaries?

From: Oguz Yilmaz <oguzyilmazlist at gmail.com>
>I have rebuilt samba3x SRPM in Centos 5.5. The resultings RPM's are
nearly in
>triple size of the original RPMs. I have installed and checked the binary
files
>are stripped. What can result in such difference in RPM sizes?
>I have not changed anything on built and install sections of spec file. 
Maybe debuging symbols...
Maybe try ldd and check if there are differences...

JD