Hi, there isn't any version of yumex in 5.1 extras directory. Perhaps it is time for version 2.0.3?
Ioannis Vranos wrote:> Hi, there isn't any version of yumex in 5.1 extras directory. Perhaps it > is time for version 2.0.3?its on the list of stuff that needs to get out - we've had virtually zero response to the testing packages, which does not help the matter much at all. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
Ioannis Vranos wrote:> Hi, there isn't any version of yumex in 5.1 extras directory. Perhaps it > is time for version 2.0.3?We have version yumex-2.0.1-1.el5.centos.noarch.rpm in the extras repo ... any compelling reason to switch? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071205/87ca4281/attachment-0003.sig>
Johnny Hughes wrote:> Ioannis Vranos wrote: >> Hi, there isn't any version of yumex in 5.1 extras directory. Perhaps it >> is time for version 2.0.3? > > We have version yumex-2.0.1-1.el5.centos.noarch.rpm in the extras repo > ... any compelling reason to switch?I don't understand the question. I am currently using 2.0.2 from EPEL which is the latest official version mentioned in yumex site, and 2.0.3 is the yumex version available in fedora core 9. Why don;t you use 2.0.2 at least, but 2.0.1?