Hi, Which one of these listings would I put in my yum.conf file to upgrade my centos 3.6 to centos 4.2? http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.2/os/ alpha or ppc? Sincerely, Melinda Odom www.designhosting.biz 479-471-0891 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.0/325 - Release Date: 4/26/2006 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060427/69996a13/attachment.html>
I guess that would depend on what type your computer is =P. ________________________________ From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Melinda Odom Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:28 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] centos 4.2 upgrade Hi, Which one of these listings would I put in my yum.conf file to upgrade my centos 3.6 to centos 4.2? http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.2/os/ alpha or ppc? Sincerely, Melinda Odom www.designhosting.biz <http://www.designhosting.biz/> 479-471-0891 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060427/693ff418/attachment.html>
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 12:27 -0500, Melinda Odom wrote:> Hi, > > Which one of these listings would I put in my yum.conf file to upgrade > my centos 3.6 to centos 4.2?Heh, funny how thing sometimes come together. Just this morning a short thread occurred that reminds one that an *upgrade* between major releases is not advised. A reinstall is recommended.> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.2/os/ > > alpha or ppc? > > Sincerely, > Melinda Odom > www.designhosting.biz > <snip sig>-- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060427/9f5b8387/attachment.sig>