I don''t understand why on a fresh centos install, i have systematicaly two dhclients running ? Here it is an extract of /var/log/messages where "ifup" appears : [...] Mar 21 11:43:13 ip-dyn152 sysctl: kernel.sysrq = 0 Mar 21 11:43:13 ip-dyn152 sysctl: kernel.core_uses_pid = 1 Mar 21 11:43:13 ip-dyn152 network: Setting network parameters: succeeded Mar 21 11:43:13 ip-dyn152 network: Bringing up loopback interface: succeeded Mar 21 11:43:13 ip-dyn152 ifup: Mar 21 11:43:13 ip-dyn152 ifup: Determining IP information for eth0... Mar 21 11:43:14 ip-dyn152 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 Mar 21 11:43:14 ip-dyn152 NET: /sbin/dhclient-script : updated /etc/resolv.conf Mar 21 11:43:14 ip-dyn152 dhclient: bound to 192.168.2.152 -- renewal in 9593 seconds. Mar 21 11:43:14 ip-dyn152 ifup: done. Mar 21 11:43:14 ip-dyn152 network: Bringing up interface eth0: succeeded Mar 21 11:43:18 ip-dyn152 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 Mar 21 11:43:18 ip-dyn152 dhclient: DHCPACK from 192.168.2.3 Mar 21 11:43:18 ip-dyn152 NET: /sbin/dhclient-script : updated /etc/resolv.conf Mar 21 11:43:18 ip-dyn152 dhclient: bound to 192.168.2.152 -- renewal in 8313 seconds. [..End of system messages ...] - Why is there dhclient messages *after* the "ifup" script ? Thank in advance for help ! -- Martin
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:52:58 +0100 Martin Hamant <mh@accelance.fr> disait:> I don''t understand why on a fresh centos install, i have systematicaly > two dhclients running ? Here it is an extract of /var/log/messages > where "ifup" appears : > > [...]it''s centos-4 related, and i mean i have to process running like that : 1856 ? Ss 0:00 /sbin/dhclient -1 -q -lf /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient-eth0.leases -pf /var/run/dhclient-eth0.pid eth0 2447 ? S<s 0:00 /sbin/dhclient -1 -q -lf /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient-eth0.leases -pf /var/run/dhclient-eth0.pid eth0 Thanks, -- Martin
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:31:21 +0100 Martin Hamant <mh@accelance.fr> disait:> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:52:58 +0100 > Martin Hamant <mh@accelance.fr> disait: > > > I don''t understand why on a fresh centos install, i have > > systematicaly two dhclients running ? Here it is an extract of > > /var/log/messages where "ifup" appears : > > > > [...] > > it''s centos-4 related, and i mean i have to process running like that > : > > 1856 ? Ss 0:00 /sbin/dhclient -1 -q -lf > /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient-eth0.leases -pf /var/run/dhclient-eth0.pid eth0 > 2447 ? S<s 0:00 /sbin/dhclient -1 -q -lf > /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient-eth0.leases -pf /var/run/dhclient-eth0.pid eth0 > > Thanks, >I''ve found from where the problem come from. Here it is the bug report i submited. https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=871 For me it''s a bug, but maybe not ... -- Martin
On Mar 22, 2005, at 10:37, Martin Hamant wrote:> I''ve found from where the problem come from. > Here it is the bug report i submited. > https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=871 > > For me it''s a bug, but maybe not ...I would assume that bug report should really go to RedHat. Please remember that these packages are simply recompiled RHEL packages. I doubt this is a CentOS problem. jens
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:41:01 +0100 Jens Vagelpohl <jens@dataflake.org> disait:> > On Mar 22, 2005, at 10:37, Martin Hamant wrote: > > I''ve found from where the problem come from. > > Here it is the bug report i submited. > > https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=871 > > > > For me it''s a bug, but maybe not ... > > I would assume that bug report should really go to RedHat. Please > remember that these packages are simply recompiled RHEL packages. I > doubt this is a CentOS problem.This is not the problem to remember or not. Of course i know this is recompiled from RHEL packages, and it''s clear this is not a CentOS "problem". The fact is we are centos users and then we discuss our problems is this MailingL, and the first reflex is to add a bug report into the associated bugzilla. There are many many posts here which are not related to Centos but to RHEL ... anyway i understand what you say and i''ll report it to redhat. Maybe it would be a great way to be more descriptive about things we have to report in Centos Bugzilla and things to report in RHEL bugzilla ... You''re welcome. -- Martin