CentOS virt - Mar 2015 - Virt SIG Meeting minutes for 10 Mar 2015

======================#centos-devel: Virt SIG
======================

Meeting started by gwd-laptop at 14:01:55 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://www.centos.org/minutes/2015/march/centos-devel.2015-03-10-14.01.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Xen updates  (gwd-laptop, 14:03:52)
  * ACTION: gwd-laptop See if there was a conclusion to the docker / xen
    dom0 kernel discussion (i.e., separate repos or no)  (gwd-laptop,
    14:08:02)

* Docker update  (gwd-laptop, 14:08:32)
  * Docker 1.5.0 in virt7-testing.  Public call for testing made, no
    timeline for official publication yet.  (gwd-laptop, 14:16:35)

* oVirt update  (gwd-laptop, 14:17:46)
  * oVirt 3.5.2 RC1 has been released upstream, 3.5.2 GA scheduled for
    first week of April  (sbonazzo, 14:17:58)
  * since CentOS 7.1 will be out sooner, we'll provide early testing and
    feedback to CentOS  (sbonazzo, 14:18:11)
  * how to test page has been created updating the exisiting legacy
    how-to  (sbonazzo, 14:18:30)
  * LINK: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/oVirt   (sbonazzo, 14:18:38)
  * and linked in main SIG page on Projects - oVirt  (sbonazzo,
    14:18:48)
  * LINK: http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization
    (sbonazzo, 14:19:02)
  * slowly progressing with dependencies building due to limited human /
    time resources  (sbonazzo, 14:19:12)
  * LINK:
    http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/Roadmap
    (sbonazzo, 14:19:21)
  * reached an agreement on qemu-kvm-rhev re-branding, it will be
    qemu-kvm-ev.  (sbonazzo, 14:19:29)
  * the new package has CentOS 7.1 dependencies so it has to wait.
    (sbonazzo, 14:19:35)

* AOB  (gwd-laptop, 14:28:34)
  * George checked the e-mail discussion and it had been concluded that
    we'd have separate tags for different project within the SIG
    (gwd-laptop, 14:29:19)

Meeting ended at 14:33:30 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* gwd-laptop See if there was a conclusion to the docker / xen dom0
  kernel discussion (i.e., separate repos or no)




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* gwd-laptop
  * gwd-laptop See if there was a conclusion to the docker / xen dom0
    kernel discussion (i.e., separate repos or no)
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* gwd-laptop (38)
* sbonazzo (25)
* lsm5 (13)
* centbot (5)
* nshaikh (2)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com