Ralph, Will you please check posts #17, 18 & 19 of this forum thread -- http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19968&start=0#forumpost76277 When you have a moment, I'm sure you will reply to it. :-) Alan.
Alan Bartlett wrote:> Ralph, > > Will you please check posts #17, 18 & 19 of this forum thread -- > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19968&start=0#forumpost76277 > > When you have a moment, I'm sure you will reply to it. :-) >iirc, requesting access on this list was mandatory and not optional. There have been moves underway to change that, but I dont recall things changing as yet. - KB
Alan Bartlett wrote:> Ralph, > > Will you please check posts #17, 18 & 19 of this forum thread -- > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19968&start=0#forumpost76277 > > When you have a moment, I'm sure you will reply to it. :-)I've never seen any request in here, I replied to him after Dag forwarded me his mail - if he doesn't see mail he gets sent, that more or less is not my problem. Regarding his issues with #centos - no idea ... But I replied :) Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20090508/ee35c7f3/attachment-0001.sig>
On 08/05/2009, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de> wrote:> Alan Bartlett wrote: > > Ralph, > > > > Will you please check posts #17, 18 & 19 of this forum thread -- > > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19968&start=0#forumpost76277 > > > > When you have a moment, I'm sure you will reply to it. :-) > > > I've never seen any request in here, I replied to him after Dag > forwarded me his mail - if he doesn't see mail he gets sent, that more > or less is not my problem. > > Regarding his issues with #centos - no idea ... > > But I replied :)Appreciated. ;-) Alan.