This patch fix a regression caused by the following patch:
Btrfs: don't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock
break while loop will make us call @spin_unlock() without
calling @spin_lock() before, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 5cb3075..f1e5297 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -8481,19 +8481,20 @@ static int __start_delalloc_inodes(struct btrfs_root
*root, int delay_iput,
else
iput(inode);
ret = -ENOMEM;
- break;
+ goto out;
}
list_add_tail(&work->list, &works);
btrfs_queue_work(root->fs_info->flush_workers,
&work->work);
ret++;
if (nr != -1 && ret >= nr)
- break;
+ goto out;
cond_resched();
spin_lock(&root->delalloc_lock);
}
spin_unlock(&root->delalloc_lock);
+out:
list_for_each_entry_safe(work, next, &works, list) {
list_del_init(&work->list);
btrfs_wait_and_free_delalloc_work(work);
--
1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html